Algosys College Basketball

Search teams and players

Type a team or player name. Results are alphabetical; players show their 2026 team. Up and Down move, Enter opens the highlighted result or the first one, Esc closes.

Troy Cotton

WI Green Bay · 32 available appearances · 2009–2009 · Linked seasons and observed career performance

Available player-season logs · Partial career coverage

Logged performance

1005:00 minutes logged

Games logged
32
Minutes per game
31:24
Points per game
12.4
Rebounds / assists per game
2.8 / 1.3
Box line on three bases
BasisPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPF
Per game12.42.81.30.50.01.02.4
Per 40 minutes15.83.51.70.60.01.33.0
Season totals39789421503376
Shooting with attempts
ShotMade–att.PctAtt/GAtt/40
FG130–29444.2%9.211.7
2P44–9844.9%†3.13.9
3P86–19643.9%6.17.8
FT51–5887.9%1.82.3
Derived rates (computed here from the box line, not published statistics)
eFG%Estimated TS%3PA / FGAFTA / FGAAST / TO
58.8%62.1%66.7%19.7%1.27

Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions

Speculative compensationβ

No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons. The logs on this page are from seasons before 2025–26. A speculative best guess with an 80% range exists for 2025–26 only, for players on a modelled team; this player's by-season table below shows it for 2025–26 if one is published, and the linked athlete page has the full card.

Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ

Loading Model-implied values by season

Game log

Game log, box line per game. eFG% is computed for the game from field goals and three-pointers; it is blank without a field-goal attempt.
Season and dateOpponentResultMinPtsRebAstStlBlkTOPFFG3PFTeFG
2009 · 2009-03-18VermontL 72–7630:00173100226-104-81-280.0%
2009 · 2009-03-07Cleveland StL 67–7333:0053110122-81-30-031.3%
2009 · 2009-02-28Wright StL 64–6535:00223310229-143-61-175.0%
2009 · 2009-02-26DetroitW 78–6235:00175000215-103-54-465.0%
2009 · 2009-02-21Long Beach StW 86–7530:0093200124-91-30-050.0%
2009 · 2009-02-18ValparaisoW 76–6129:00150220124-83-64-468.8%
2009 · 2009-02-14Cleveland StL 75–8335:00133310454-92-63-455.6%
2009 · 2009-02-12Youngstown StL 73–7734:00107000024-102-50-050.0%
2009 · 2009-02-07WI MilwaukeeW 72–6832:0051000022-71-30-035.7%
2009 · 2009-02-02ButlerW 75–6630:00193000044-73-58-978.6%
2009 · 2009-01-31Loyola-ChicagoW 87–6829:00253100127-137-124-480.8%
2009 · 2009-01-28IL ChicagoW 83–7236:00257430018-147-122-282.1%
2009 · 2009-01-24ValparaisoW 83–7630:0051200111-61-52-225.0%
2009 · 2009-01-22ButlerL 59–6823:00134100254-62-23-383.3%
2009 · 2009-01-19Houston ChrW 91–5323:0051020021-41-42-237.5%
2009 · 2009-01-17Youngstown StW 78–6125:00112100234-73-50-078.6%
2009 · 2009-01-15Cleveland StW 80–6533:0063300132-62-40-050.0%
2009 · 2009-01-09WI MilwaukeeW 77–7532:0043300122-90-40-022.2%
2009 · 2009-01-05Loyola-ChicagoL 60–6226:0052000141-81-72-218.8%
2009 · 2009-01-03IL ChicagoW 66–6135:00183100117-144-90-164.3%
2009 · 2008-12-30W MichiganW 61–5134:0093110003-93-70-050.0%
2009 · 2008-12-22Houston ChrW 80–7833:0092200143-133-100-034.6%
2009 · 2008-12-20North DakotaW 96–5825:00133400025-83-40-081.3%
2009 · 2008-12-18OaklandL 76–7939:00164110025-153-113-543.3%
2009 · 2008-12-13WisconsinL 57–7730:0051000142-61-20-041.7%
2009 · 2008-12-11Idaho StW 68–5332:00222000018-126-90-091.7%
2009 · 2008-12-06DetroitW 57–4637:00153110215-125-120-062.5%
2009 · 2008-12-04Wright StW 57–4632:00102000133-42-32-2100.0%
2009 · 2008-11-29MassachusettsW 84–6734:00212200027-155-102-363.3%
2009 · 2008-11-23Morgan StW 71–5431:0064100032-80-32-225.0%
2009 · 2008-11-22MarshallW 72–6628:00131110343-61-46-658.3%
2009 · 2008-11-18UtahL 60–7935:0092110223-73-70-064.3%

ESPN player box scores via frozen SportsDataverse releases; games corroborated against Kaggle dates, participants, final scores and overtime. Native athlete identities verified against roster evidence.