Donovan Atwell
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2870:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 108
- Minutes per game
- 26:35
- Points per game
- 10.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 0.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.2 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.4 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 1104 | 277 | 70 | 85 | 12 | 80 | 209 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 359–866 | 41.5% | 8.0 | 12.1 |
| 2P | 75–175 | 42.9% | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 3P | 284–691 | 41.1% | 6.4 | 9.6 |
| FT | 102–114 | 89.5% | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.9% | 60.3% | 79.8% | 13.2% | 0.88 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Donovan Atwell | UNC Greensboro | 23 | 6:45 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 16.0 | 30.2% | 100.0%† | 50.2%† |
| 2024 Donovan Atwell | UNC Greensboro | 26 | 29:29 | 10.2 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 13.8 | 39.9% | 95.8%† | 57.3% |
| 2025 Donovan Atwell | UNC Greensboro | 25 | 30:48 | 12.8 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 16.6 | 38.2% | 90.5% | 55.1% |
| 2026 Donovan Atwell | Texas Tech | 34 | 34:39 | 13.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 15.6 | 45.8% | 84.1% | 68.6% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Texas Tech · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $710K
- 80% range $470K to $1.05M
- Median share of team pool
- 19.5%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $710K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 87.7%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Texas Tech: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Texas Tech | $710Kspeculative | $470K to $1.05M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.0 | +2.8 to +5.3 | Sufficient evidence | +3.1 | +0.9 | +7.8range +6.9 to +8.7 | 3,816 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UNC Greensboro | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.4 | +0.2 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +0.3 | +4.2range +3.4 to +4.9 | 2,321 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | UNC Greensboro | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.3 | -1.1 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | -1.0 | +3.2range +2.5 to +4.0 | 2,580 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | UNC Greensboro | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.4 to +0.4 | Limited evidence | +0.4 | -0.8 | +0.6range +0.5 to +0.8 | 515 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology