Nana Owusu-Anane
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
2148:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 77
- Minutes per game
- 27:54
- Points per game
- 9.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 7.1 / 1.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.2 | 7.1 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.2 | 10.2 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 709 | 550 | 128 | 99 | 61 | 131 | 206 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 264–588 | 44.9% | 7.6 | 10.9 |
| 2P | 211–420 | 50.2% | 5.5 | 7.8 |
| 3P | 53–168 | 31.5% | 2.2 | 3.1 |
| FT | 128–198 | 64.6% | 2.6 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.4% | 52.5% | 28.6% | 33.7% | 0.98 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Nana Owusu-Anane | Brown | 18 | 16:38 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 11.9 | 28.6%† | 56.5%† | 45.8%† |
| 2023 Nana Owusu-Anane | Brown | 18 | 28:24 | 9.8 | 7.6 | 2.1 | 13.8 | 15.8%† | 58.1% | 49.6% |
| 2024 Nana Owusu-Anane | Brown | 9Few games | 32:49 | 16.2 | 9.6 | 2.0 | 19.8 | 24.0%† | 66.7% | 56.0% |
| 2026 Nana Owusu-Anane | Grand Canyon | 32 | 32:35 | 9.3 | 8.5 | 1.8 | 11.4 | 35.9% | 72.6% | 55.1% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Grand Canyon · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $180K
- 80% range $73K to $445K
- Median share of team pool
- 22.1%
- team pool $775K, 80% range $335K to $1.75M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $165K to $225K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 82.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Grand Canyon: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Grand Canyon | $180Kspeculative | $73K to $445K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.9 | +2.9 to +4.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +3.0 | +6.8range +6.2 to +7.4 | 3,101 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Brown | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.8 | +0.2 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | +0.3 | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.0 | 1,022 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Brown | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | -0.1 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +1.7 | +2.9range +2.4 to +3.4 | 1,808 | Season detail | |
| 2022 | Brown | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.2 | -1.4 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.0 | +0.7 | Not computed for this season | 1,046 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology