Tre-Vaughn Minott
Only corroborated player-season records; not complete career coverage.
Observed career performance
1634:35 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 82
- Minutes per game
- 19:56
- Points per game
- 6.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 0.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.5 | 6.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.1 | 12.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 4.4 |
| Season totals | 535 | 496 | 18 | 37 | 93 | 69 | 178 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 220–325 | 67.7% | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 2P | 220–325 | 67.7% | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 3P | 0–0 | — | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| FT | 95–161 | 59.0% | 2.0 | 3.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67.7% | 67.6% | 0.0% | 49.5% | 0.26 |
Combined corroborated seasons only; not complete career coverage. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Linked seasons
| Season | Team | G | MPG | Pts | Reb | Ast | Pts/40 | 3P% | FT% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Tre-Vaughn Minott | South Carolina | 7Few games | 9:09 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 11.2 | — | 0.0%† | 50.3%† |
| 2022 Tre-Vaughn Minott | South Carolina | 11Under 100 minutes | 7:20 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 10.9 | — | 0.0%† | 79.9%† |
| 2024 Tre-Vaughn Minott | Portland St | 11Under 100 minutes | 4:26 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 8.2 | — | 57.1%† | 49.6%† |
| 2025 Tre-Vaughn Minott | Portland St | 25 | 24:26 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 0.3 | 13.6 | — | 59.2% | 68.8% |
| 2026 Tre-Vaughn Minott | Portland St. | 28 | 29:39 | 9.9 | 8.8 | 0.3 | 13.3 | — | 63.6% | 68.3% |
Career identity corroborated by repeated game, team and individual-statistic matches. Unlinked seasons are excluded.
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Portland St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $23K
- 80% range $5K to $73K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.8%
- team pool $215K, 80% range $82K to $570K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $23K to $24K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Portland St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Portland St | $23Kspeculative | $5K to $73K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.0 | -0.2 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +1.5 | +5.2range +4.6 to +6.1 | 2,778 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Portland St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.0 | +1.9 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +2.9 | +4.0range +3.6 to +4.6 | 2,066 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
| 2022 | South Carolina | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | +0.8 | +0.2 to +1.3 | Limited evidence | +0.5 | +0.3 | Not computed for this season | 300 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. | |
| 2021 | Not applicable | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | No model-implied value is published: fewer than 300 on-court possessions, or the team’s games were outside the lineup audit. | Not applicable | |||||||
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology