Jayson Petty
Kansas City · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
862:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 30:49
- Points per game
- 10.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.0 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.7 | 5.2 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 295 | 113 | 43 | 37 | 13 | 49 | 69 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 98–258 | 38.0% | 9.2 | 12.0 |
| 2P | 55–113 | 48.7% | 4.0 | 5.2 |
| 3P | 43–145 | 29.7% | 5.2 | 6.7 |
| FT | 56–67 | 83.6% | 2.4 | 3.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.3% | 51.3% | 56.2% | 26.0% | 0.88 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Missouri KC · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $2K to $125K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.0%
- team pool $205K, 80% range $75K to $525K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $26K to $34K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Missouri KC: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Missouri KC | $28Kspeculative | $2K to $125K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.5 | -2.4 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.7 | +0.3 | +1.5range +1.3 to +1.6 | 1,291 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Missouri KC | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.2 | -3.0 to -1.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.6 | -0.6 | +2.4range +2.0 to +3.0 | 1,913 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:59 | 30:49 | 21:48–38:23 | |
| Points | 13.0 | 10.5 | 2.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.8% | 43.0% | 0.0%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | Oral Roberts | L 62–84 | 35:07 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 46.2% |
| 2026-02-28 | Oral Roberts | L 70–94 | 25:08 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5-11 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-26 | South Dakota St. | L 59–73 | 36:44 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-12 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | North Dakota St. | L 59–95 | 22:45 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1-9 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-19 | North Dakota | L 70–85 | 30:11 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-10 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 64–104 | 29:41 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Oral Roberts | L 60–69 | 38:23 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2-10 | 2-7 | 5-5 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | South Dakota | L 75–82 | 38:14 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-01 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 64–99 | 30:51 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | Denver | L 61–69 | 29:47 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Omaha | L 60–77 | 22:46 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-17 | South Dakota St. | L 62–90 | 24:40 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-15 · NCAA | South Dakota | L 83–99 | 31:00 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | North Dakota | L 79–81 | 36:48 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5-8 | 4-6 | 4-4 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-08 · NCAA | North Dakota St. | L 73–97 | 21:48 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 · NCAA | Omaha | W 73–66 | 33:06 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 38.9% |
| 2025-12-31 · NCAA | Denver | L 74–87 | 22:42 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-18 · NCAA | Oklahoma St. | L 79–91 | 33:06 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 8-9 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-16 · NCAA | Oklahoma | L 67–89 | 35:48 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3-8 | 2-6 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-10 · NCAA | Weber St. | L 60–64 | 35:54 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 5-8 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 · NCAA | Eastern Wash. | L 66–90 | 31:06 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-03 · NCAA | Idaho St. | L 59–68 | 32:18 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-6 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-29 · NCAA | Weber St. | L 61–82 | 30:36 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 65.0% |
| 2025-11-24 · NCAA | Lindenwood | L 67–80 | 32:48 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | TCU | L 45–81 | 26:48 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-6 | 2-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Texas | L 55–71 | 36:42 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-12 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-11 · NCAA | Iona | L 91–105 | 36:12 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-15 | 2-8 | 2-3 | 53.3% |
| 2025-11-07 · NCAA | Southern Ill. | L 78–101 | 22:00 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 60.0% |