Jaylen Crocker-Johnson
Minnesota · 2025–26 · 24 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
759:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 24
- Minutes per game
- 31:40
- Points per game
- 13.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.8 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 13.4 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.9 | 8.6 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 3.6 |
| Season totals | 322 | 164 | 43 | 15 | 24 | 40 | 68 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 112–270 | 41.5% | 11.3 | 14.2 |
| 2P | 70–140 | 50.0% | 5.8 | 7.4 |
| 3P | 42–130 | 32.3% | 5.4 | 6.8 |
| FT | 56–78 | 71.8% | 3.3 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.3% | 52.9% | 48.1% | 28.9% | 1.07 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Minnesota · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $375K
- 80% range $165K to $630K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.7%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $375K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 58.2%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Minnesota: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Minnesota | $375Kspeculative | $165K to $630K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.1 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +1.0 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.2 | 2,441 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Colorado St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.9 | +0.8 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.4 | +0.5 | +3.4range +2.9 to +3.9 | 1,979 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Ark Little Rock | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.2 | +1.8 to +4.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +2.3 | +4.3range +3.6 to +5.1 | 2,278 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:11 | 31:40 | 19:23–39:27 | |
| Points | 10.4 | 13.4 | 4.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 35.4% | 48.6% | 14.3%–75.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-08 | Maryland | L 62–67 | 32:29 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-04 | Michigan St. | W 76–73 | 34:09 | 22 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7-14 | 4-8 | 4-6 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-01 | Penn St. | L 75–77 | 35:37 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4-12 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | Wisconsin | L 63–67 | 38:15 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 14.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Nebraska | L 57–76 | 35:25 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-16 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-20 | Ohio St. | L 74–82 | 38:49 | 26 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11-19 | 1-7 | 3-4 | 60.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Illinois | L 67–77 | 28:51 | 22 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-18 | 5-12 | 1-1 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-13 | Wisconsin | L 75–78 | 33:54 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 5-7 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-09 | Southern California | L 69–70 | 29:55 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Iowa | W 70–67 | 31:58 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 3-6 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Northwestern | W 84–78 | 27:02 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-9 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | FDU | W 60–43 | 36:16 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-14 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 57.1% |
| 2025-12-21 | Campbell | W 78–50 | 19:23 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Texas Southern | W 89–53 | 31:08 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 4-5 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-10 | Purdue | L 57–85 | 30:39 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6-13 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 61.5% |
| 2025-12-03 | Indiana | W 73–64 | 25:25 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4-9 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-28 | Santa Clara | L 75–86 | 30:08 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-27 | Stanford | L 68–72 | 38:21 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7-15 | 3-5 | 6-8 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-22 | San Francisco | L 65–77 | 23:19 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Chicago St. | W 66–54 | 32:59 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-10 | 2-5 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Green Bay | W 72–65 | 39:27 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-12 | Missouri | L 60–83 | 34:30 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Alcorn | W 95–50 | 26:37 | 15 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-17 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 26.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Gardner-Webb | W 87–60 | 25:18 | 13 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 7-10 | 42.9% |