Tate Sage
Iowa · 2025–26 · 37 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
585:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 37
- Minutes per game
- 15:50
- Points per game
- 6.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.1 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.4 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 3.4 |
| Season totals | 226 | 76 | 25 | 10 | 6 | 19 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 72–146 | 49.3% | 3.9 | 10.0 |
| 2P | 44–74 | 59.5%† | 2.0 | 5.1 |
| 3P | 28–72 | 38.9% | 1.9 | 4.9 |
| FT | 54–76 | 71.1% | 2.1 | 5.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58.9% | 63.0% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 1.32 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Iowa · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $145K
- 80% range $34K to $275K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.3%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $145K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $29K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 39.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Iowa: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Iowa | $145Kspeculative | $34K to $275K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.6 | -1.3 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | -1.3 | +2.7range +2.1 to +3.1 | 1,811 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 17:52 | 15:50 | 2:10–30:02 | |
| Points | 9.2 | 6.1 | 0.0–19.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 60.5% | 52.9% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-28 | Illinois | L 59–71 | 16:48 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-03-26 | Nebraska | W 77–71 | 28:43 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-22 | Florida | W 73–72 | 13:31 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-20 | Clemson | W 67–61 | 12:12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Ohio St. | L 69–72 | 18:05 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-11 | Maryland | W 75–64 | 2:10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-08 | Nebraska | L 75–84 | 7:03 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Michigan | L 68–71 | 20:56 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Penn St. | L 69–71 | 4:40 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Ohio St. | W 74–57 | 8:47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | Wisconsin | L 71–84 | 23:09 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | Nebraska | W 57–52 | 8:00 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Purdue | L 57–78 | 8:35 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Maryland | L 70–77 | 8:53 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Northwestern | W 76–70 | 12:55 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Washington | W 84–74 | 19:25 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-01 | Oregon | W 84–66 | 13:05 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Southern California | W 73–72 | 11:20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Rutgers | W 68–62 | 30:02 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 4-6 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Indiana | W 74–57 | 20:23 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 125.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Purdue | L 72–79 | 20:15 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Illinois | L 69–75 | 28:15 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-06 | Minnesota | L 67–70 | 20:58 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | UCLA | W 74–61 | 16:24 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-29 | UMass Lowell | W 90–62 | 18:03 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Bucknell | W 94–39 | 22:40 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-14 | Western Mich. | W 91–51 | 21:58 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 78.6% |
| 2025-12-11 | Iowa St. | L 62–66 | 24:43 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Maryland | W 83–64 | 19:16 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 61.1% |
| 2025-12-02 | Michigan St. | L 52–71 | 11:08 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Grand Canyon | W 59–46 | 3:06 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Ole Miss | W 74–69 | 4:25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-20 | Chicago St. | W 93–54 | 15:52 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 4-6 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Southeast Mo. St. | W 99–70 | 18:30 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Xavier | W 81–62 | 12:12 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 116.7% |
| 2025-11-07 | Western Ill. | W 77–58 | 23:55 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 1-6 | 1-2 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-04 | Robert Morris | W 101–69 | 15:18 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 0.0% |