Isaac Bruns
South Dakota · 2025–26 · 16 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
510:54 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 16
- Minutes per game
- 31:56
- Points per game
- 20.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.3 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 20.7 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 25.9 | 6.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 331 | 85 | 20 | 19 | 2 | 35 | 30 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 109–251 | 43.4% | 15.7 | 19.7 |
| 2P | 86–187 | 46.0% | 11.7 | 14.6 |
| 3P | 23–64 | 35.9% | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| FT | 90–107 | 84.1% | 6.7 | 8.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.0% | 55.5% | 25.5% | 42.6% | 0.57 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
South Dakota · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $5K
- 80% range $1K to $27K
- Median share of team pool
- 3.2%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $85K to $600K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $5K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 42.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
South Dakota: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | South Dakota | $5Kspeculative | $1K to $27K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.3 | -3.5 to -0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -2.5 | +1.8range +1.4 to +2.1 | 1,488 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | South Dakota | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.8 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -1.7 | +1.2range +0.9 to +1.5 | 1,124 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:49 | 31:56 | 24:41–37:29 | |
| Points | 20.8 | 20.7 | 14.0–29.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.2% | 48.4% | 33.3%–70.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-17 | North Dakota | L 80–96 | 32:33 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-16 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 99–83 | 34:00 | 22 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-16 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Denver | W 82–72 | 35:55 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8-12 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 70.8% |
| 2026-01-07 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 86–99 | 34:09 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8-17 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 52.9% |
| 2025-12-31 | North Dakota St. | L 61–84 | 37:29 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 5-13 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-20 | Kansas St. | L 76–106 | 31:16 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-17 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Prairie View | W 97–85 | 33:15 | 29 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-17 | 2-3 | 9-12 | 58.8% |
| 2025-12-09 | Wyoming | L 79–106 | 28:00 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-15 | 1-4 | 9-9 | 43.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Northern Colo. | L 87–89 | 37:22 | 28 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 10-19 | 0-2 | 8-8 | 52.6% |
| 2025-12-03 | Portland St. | L 71–77 | 34:46 | 28 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 8-17 | 2-4 | 10-13 | 52.9% |
| 2025-11-23 | South Carolina St. | W 82–81 | 25:09 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-4 | 4-6 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-20 | Missouri | L 68–102 | 30:50 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5-15 | 2-8 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Western Mich. | W 83–78 | 26:34 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-14 | 2-8 | 6-9 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-12 | Southern Ind. | W 89–74 | 29:54 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5-15 | 1-3 | 7-7 | 36.7% |
| 2025-11-05 | Creighton | L 76–92 | 24:41 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-13 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Utah Tech | L 79–81 | 35:01 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8-24 | 0-4 | 7-9 | 33.3% |