Toyaz Solomon
UNC Asheville · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1002:39 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 34:34
- Points per game
- 17.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 7.2 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.1 | 7.2 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.8 | 8.3 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| Season totals | 497 | 209 | 56 | 30 | 39 | 67 | 63 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 179–398 | 45.0% | 13.7 | 15.9 |
| 2P | 147–311 | 47.3% | 10.7 | 12.4 |
| 3P | 32–87 | 36.8% | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| FT | 107–158 | 67.7% | 5.4 | 6.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.0% | 53.2% | 21.9% | 39.7% | 0.84 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UNC Asheville · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $40K
- 80% range $13K to $120K
- Median share of team pool
- 23.6%
- team pool $160K, 80% range $57K to $425K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $37K to $48K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 86.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UNC Asheville: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UNC Asheville | $40Kspeculative | $13K to $120K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.0 | +0.9 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.3 | +0.7 | +5.8range +5.2 to +6.3 | 3,180 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UNC Asheville | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.6 | +0.5 to +2.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.0 | -0.4 | +4.1range +3.6 to +4.8 | 2,935 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | UNC Asheville | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.9 to +2.1 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -0.5 | +2.2range +1.7 to +2.7 | 1,247 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 40:15 | 34:34 | 20:16–44:16 | |
| Points | 23.8 | 17.1 | 6.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 57.3% | 47.9% | 22.7%–79.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | High Point | L 71–75 | 39:08 | 30 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 10-20 | 2-5 | 8-11 | 55.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Longwood | W 85–82 | 42:58 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8-16 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Charleston So. | L 75–92 | 37:23 | 23 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-17 | 0-4 | 7-9 | 47.1% |
| 2026-02-26 | Gardner-Webb | W 77–71 | 37:29 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 7-11 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 63.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | Radford | W 74–73 | 44:16 | 23 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10-18 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-19 | High Point | L 48–74 | 32:36 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 36.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | Presbyterian | L 57–58 | 35:18 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-12 | Longwood | W 79–74 | 37:34 | 24 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-18 | 2-4 | 6-11 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | USC Upstate | W 76–67 | 36:57 | 15 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Winthrop | L 71–84 | 36:30 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4-14 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Gardner-Webb | W 69–50 | 34:27 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-11 | 1-4 | 4-7 | 22.7% |
| 2026-01-21 | USC Upstate | W 83–69 | 34:31 | 15 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-15 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Winthrop | L 67–69 | 35:15 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6-15 | 2-6 | 6-7 | 46.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | Presbyterian | L 70–71 | 35:09 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-11 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | Radford | W 91–72 | 29:49 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-07 | Longwood | W 72–61 | 37:32 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4-14 | 0-3 | 2-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-03 | Charleston So. | L 83–86 | 34:36 | 34 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 12-26 | 3-6 | 7-10 | 51.9% |
| 2025-12-31 | High Point | L 69–87 | 24:06 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-21 | UAB | L 47–72 | 32:17 | 16 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7-14 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 59–80 | 20:16 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-10 | Miami (OH) | L 87–90 | 34:05 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11-17 | 5-6 | 4-5 | 79.4% |
| 2025-12-06 | NC State | L 63–75 | 39:42 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 6-7 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | UNC Greensboro | W 82–77 | 38:22 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 5-9 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-30 | App State | W 67–55 | 36:02 | 25 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8-16 | 0-2 | 9-11 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Tennessee St. | L 73–75 | 31:00 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 72.7% |
| 2025-11-19 | Western Caro. | L 73–80 | 36:39 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8-14 | 3-4 | 3-6 | 67.9% |
| 2025-11-11 | Lipscomb | W 69–64 | 31:20 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Ga. Southern | L 90–93 | 26:34 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Wichita St. | L 58–75 | 30:48 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6-18 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 33.3% |