Miro Little
UC Santa Barbara · 2025–26 · 16 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
478:27 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 16
- Minutes per game
- 29:54
- Points per game
- 12.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.6 / 4.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.7 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.0 | 7.5 | 6.4 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 2.2 |
| Season totals | 203 | 90 | 77 | 22 | 6 | 37 | 26 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 61–135 | 45.2% | 8.4 | 11.3 |
| 2P | 41–75 | 54.7%† | 4.7 | 6.3 |
| 3P | 20–60 | 33.3% | 3.8 | 5.0 |
| FT | 61–73 | 83.6% | 4.6 | 6.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.6% | 60.7% | 44.4% | 54.1% | 2.08 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UC Santa Barbara · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $10K to $81K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.8%
- team pool $285K, 80% range $105K to $785K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $32K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 45.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UC Santa Barbara: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UC Santa Barbara | $28Kspeculative | $10K to $81K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.6 | +0.9 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +0.4 | +3.7range +3.3 to +4.0 | 871 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Utah | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | +0.0 to +2.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +0.8 | +2.1range +1.8 to +2.4 | 1,657 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Baylor | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.5 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -0.4 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.9 | 666 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:45 | 29:54 | 11:54–35:36 | |
| Points | 11.0 | 12.7 | 1.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.1% | 52.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | UC Davis | L 73–79 | 34:02 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-4 | 3-4 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-07 | UC San Diego | L 63–64 | 34:28 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-31 · NCAA | Cal St. Fullerton | W 83–69 | 26:30 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-29 | UC San Diego | W 62–48 | 34:29 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 8-13 | 29.2% |
| 2026-01-24 | Long Beach St. | W 74–71 | 34:16 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-01-22 · NCAA | Cal Poly | W 107–67 | 22:18 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Hawaii | W 77–62 | 28:05 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-9 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | CSU Bakersfield | W 75–69 | 27:30 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-08 · NCAA | UC Davis | L 86–93 | 23:36 | 20 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7-10 | 2-4 | 4-6 | 80.0% |
| 2025-12-04 · NCAA | Long Beach St. | W 84–77 | 11:54 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-29 · NCAA | Seattle U | W 74–71 | 30:18 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 5-6 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-28 · NCAA | Lehigh | W 72–70 | 33:12 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-3 | 10-10 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-22 | Nevada | L 64–77 | 35:36 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 5-6 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-17 | LMU (CA) | L 74–78 | 33:22 | 19 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8-16 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Sacramento St. | W 92–87 | 34:37 | 17 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-9 | 1-5 | 10-10 | 38.9% |
| 2025-11-08 | San Jose St. | W 85–74 | 34:14 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 64.3% |