Justin Moore
Loyola Chicago · 2025–26 · 22 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
642:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 22
- Minutes per game
- 29:13
- Points per game
- 10.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.2 / 3.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.9 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.9 | 3.0 | 5.2 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4.0 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 240 | 48 | 84 | 15 | 2 | 65 | 45 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 79–200 | 39.5% | 9.1 | 12.4 |
| 2P | 54–116 | 46.6% | 5.3 | 7.2 |
| 3P | 25–84 | 29.8% | 3.8 | 5.2 |
| FT | 57–77 | 74.0% | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.8% | 51.3% | 42.0% | 38.5% | 1.29 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Loyola-Chicago · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $24K
- 80% range $3K to $93K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.3%
- team pool $665K, 80% range $290K to $1.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $22K to $33K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $4K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 45.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Loyola-Chicago: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Loyola-Chicago | $24Kspeculative | $3K to $93K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.6 | -2.9 to -0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -1.4 | +1.8range +1.5 to +2.2 | 1,835 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Loyola-Chicago | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.2 | +1.4 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | +1.0 | +1.1range +1.0 to +1.2 | 653 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Drexel | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | +0.2 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | +0.4 | +3.7range +3.1 to +4.5 | 2,485 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Drexel | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.3 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -0.6 | +1.9range +1.3 to +2.5 | 1,655 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:08 | 29:13 | 8:20–35:29 | |
| Points | 6.8 | 10.9 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.4% | 44.5% | 0.0%–77.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-18 | Fordham | L 59–62 | 30:54 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | — |
| 2026-02-13 | Saint Louis | L 59–86 | 26:38 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-06 | Davidson | L 64–84 | 18:38 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | La Salle | W 71–61 | 23:01 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-30 | VCU | L 75–89 | 31:27 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2-14 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 21.4% |
| 2026-01-27 | Saint Joseph's | L 64–85 | 26:43 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | George Washington | L 66–101 | 8:20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Dayton | L 68–70 | 35:29 | 19 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 8-16 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 59.4% |
| 2025-12-31 | Rhode Island | W 61–57 | 34:45 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 7-11 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 77.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | Santa Clara | W 80–78 | 32:58 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 72.2% |
| 2025-12-17 | San Francisco | L 71–85 | 31:20 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Chicago St. | L 75–84 | 26:32 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 22.2% |
| 2025-12-06 | Princeton | W 73–68 | 34:56 | 21 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7-14 | 1-4 | 6-8 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-02 | Central Mich. | W 83–72 | 33:15 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 10-14 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | San Jose St. | L 51–63 | 34:11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | UNI | L 51–72 | 27:25 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-13 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 23.1% |
| 2025-11-21 | NIU | L 59–76 | 32:02 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-16 | Colorado St. | L 67–80 | 25:05 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 6-7 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-13 | Wichita St. | L 74–95 | 29:21 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-09 | North Texas | L 62–64 | 35:12 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 27.8% |
| 2025-11-06 | Mercyhurst | L 65–73 | 33:13 | 25 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8-15 | 3-6 | 6-7 | 63.3% |
| 2025-11-03 | Cleveland St. | W 91–88 | 31:18 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-12 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 25.0% |