Chuck Love III
Loyola Chicago · 2025–26 · 13 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
319:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 13
- Minutes per game
- 24:37
- Points per game
- 7.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.6 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.2 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.8 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 94 | 34 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 30–75 | 40.0%† | 5.8 | 9.4 |
| 2P | 11–17 | 64.7%† | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| 3P | 19–58 | 32.8% | 4.5 | 7.3 |
| FT | 15–19 | 78.9%† | 1.5 | 2.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.7%† | 56.4%† | 77.3%† | 25.3%† | 1.44 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Loyola-Chicago · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $29K
- 80% range $7K to $86K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.6%
- team pool $665K, 80% range $290K to $1.55M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $26K to $40K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $4K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 19.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Loyola-Chicago: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Loyola-Chicago | $29Kspeculative | $7K to $86K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.1 | -0.9 to +1.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.6 | +1.0range +0.9 to +1.1 | 794 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 19:54 | 24:37 | 10:02–35:21 | |
| Points | 3.4 | 7.2 | 0.0–14.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 36.5% | 47.0% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-20 | Santa Clara | W 80–78 | 19:51 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | San Francisco | L 71–85 | 10:02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Chicago St. | L 75–84 | 14:52 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Princeton | W 73–68 | 27:30 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Central Mich. | W 83–72 | 27:17 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 4-5 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | San Jose St. | L 51–63 | 35:21 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 4-5 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | UNI | L 51–72 | 30:25 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-11 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 40.9% |
| 2025-11-21 | NIU | L 59–76 | 30:15 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-16 | Colorado St. | L 67–80 | 26:07 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2025-11-13 | Wichita St. | L 74–95 | 26:38 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 91.7% |
| 2025-11-09 | North Texas | L 62–64 | 30:41 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-5 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-06 | Mercyhurst | L 65–73 | 20:10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Cleveland St. | W 91–88 | 20:50 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-7 | 3-3 | 68.8% |