Zach Davis
Memphis · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
582:43 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 20:49
- Points per game
- 7.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.0 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.5 | 8.0 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 197 | 116 | 32 | 29 | 9 | 51 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 71–172 | 41.3% | 6.1 | 11.8 |
| 2P | 53–105 | 50.5% | 3.8 | 7.2 |
| 3P | 18–67 | 26.9% | 2.4 | 4.6 |
| FT | 37–49 | 75.5% | 1.8 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.5% | 50.9% | 39.0% | 28.5% | 0.63 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Memphis · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $38K
- 80% range $5K to $125K
- Median share of team pool
- 5.3%
- team pool $1.00M, 80% range $455K to $2.20M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $38K to $40K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 45.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Memphis: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Memphis | $38Kspeculative | $5K to $125K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -1.8 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | -1.0 | +2.5range +2.2 to +2.9 | 1,987 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:03 | 20:49 | 2:49–34:22 | |
| Points | 9.2 | 7.0 | 0.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 51.9% | 43.1% | 0.0%–80.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | Tulane | L 69–81 | 32:14 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 40.9% |
| 2026-03-08 | Tulane | W 96–95 | 34:22 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-05 | South Fla. | L 89–96 | 30:31 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8-10 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 80.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | East Carolina | L 68–84 | 16:51 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Wichita St. | L 82–88 | 26:15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | UAB | L 67–78 | 7:47 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | South Fla. | L 66–87 | 8:51 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | North Texas | L 69–76 | 23:38 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-01 | Tulane | L 76–78 | 21:40 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-29 | Fla. Atlantic | W 92–65 | 20:52 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Wichita St. | L 59–74 | 19:04 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-21 | Tulsa | L 66–83 | 19:10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | UTSA | W 95–69 | 20:04 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Temple | W 55–53 | 12:31 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Fla. Atlantic | L 78–89 | 23:38 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Rice | W 76–70 | 23:02 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 4-6 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Alabama St. | W 88–67 | 12:47 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Mississippi St. | L 66–71 | 2:49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-17 | Vanderbilt | L 70–77 | 23:58 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Louisville | L 73–99 | 21:10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Baylor | W 78–71 | 33:12 | 23 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-14 | 1-3 | 8-10 | 53.6% |
| 2025-12-03 | LSU New Orleans | W 86–70 | 23:30 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-26 | Southern Ill. | W 74–58 | 19:04 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Wake Forest | L 68–69 | 24:10 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-20 | Purdue | L 71–80 | 27:51 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 6-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | UNLV | L 78–92 | 17:20 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Ole Miss | L 77–83 | 14:29 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | San Francisco | W 76–70 | 21:53 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 0.0% |