Daniel Rivera
UAB · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
916:20 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 29:34
- Points per game
- 11.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.4 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.8 | 6.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.9 | 8.6 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 365 | 198 | 33 | 26 | 31 | 40 | 69 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 148–272 | 54.4% | 8.8 | 11.9 |
| 2P | 146–265 | 55.1% | 8.5 | 11.6 |
| 3P | 2–7 | 28.6%† | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| FT | 67–114 | 58.8% | 3.7 | 5.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.8% | 56.6% | 2.6% | 41.9% | 0.82 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UAB · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $65K
- 80% range $11K to $185K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.0%
- team pool $785K, 80% range $355K to $1.75M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $63K to $66K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UAB: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UAB | $65Kspeculative | $11K to $185K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -1.1 | +1.3 | +4.8range +4.2 to +5.5 | 3,231 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Massachusetts | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.4 | -0.6 to +1.7 | Sufficient evidence | -0.8 | +1.2 | +3.1range +2.7 to +3.8 | 2,833 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Bryant | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.3 | +1.3 to +3.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +2.6 | +4.6range +4.0 to +5.2 | 3,190 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:04 | 29:34 | 21:05–42:29 | |
| Points | 14.0 | 11.8 | 5.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 65.8% | 55.8% | 30.8%–90.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Charlotte | L 78–83 | 35:21 | 20 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-08 | East Carolina | W 90–83 | 29:25 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9-10 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 90.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Charlotte | W 80–74 | 28:19 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | North Texas | L 58–62 | 29:00 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | Memphis | W 78–67 | 28:16 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-18 | Temple | W 76–71 | 30:04 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-15 | Tulane | L 54–55 | 36:42 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-15 | 0-1 | 2-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-11 | Tulsa | W 68–63 | 32:58 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-13 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 30.8% |
| 2026-02-08 | Rice | W 71–65 | 40:00 | 19 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 3-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-05 | Memphis | L 80–90 | 31:46 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | North Texas | W 72–68 | 22:03 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | UTSA | W 83–73 | 26:31 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | South Fla. | L 69–82 | 23:09 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 8-11 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | Tulsa | L 77–99 | 23:19 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-14 | Tulane | W 82–69 | 34:19 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | East Carolina | W 87–85 | 34:31 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-07 | Fla. Atlantic | L 71–76 | 25:50 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 1-5 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-04 | South Fla. | W 109–106 | 42:29 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7-12 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Wichita St. | L 70–75 | 26:14 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-21 | UNC Asheville | W 72–47 | 29:03 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Cleveland St. | W 101–77 | 29:08 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 5-8 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-14 | Troy | L 85–86 | 33:58 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-05 | Drake | W 74–69 | 28:31 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-01 | Middle Tenn. | L 61–76 | 25:06 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 44.4% |
| 2025-11-25 | UTEP | W 75–59 | 24:19 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-24 | Southern Ill. | W 81–73 | 22:38 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-3 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | South Alabama | W 80–72 | 33:50 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | High Point | W 91–74 | 30:43 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-11 | Alabama St. | L 74–77 | 29:09 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-07 | NC State | L 70–94 | 28:34 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-7 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Mississippi Val. | W 106–55 | 21:05 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 55.6% |