Chance Westry
UAB · 2025–26 · 31 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
959:19 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 31
- Minutes per game
- 30:57
- Points per game
- 15.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.7 / 5.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.3 | 3.7 | 5.6 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.8 | 4.8 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| Season totals | 474 | 115 | 174 | 39 | 15 | 59 | 55 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 161–334 | 48.2% | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| 2P | 142–251 | 56.6% | 8.1 | 10.5 |
| 3P | 19–83 | 22.9% | 2.7 | 3.5 |
| FT | 133–188 | 70.7% | 6.1 | 7.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.0% | 56.9% | 24.9% | 56.3% | 2.95 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UAB · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $190K
- 80% range $77K to $480K
- Median share of team pool
- 22.6%
- team pool $785K, 80% range $355K to $1.75M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $180K to $190K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UAB: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UAB | $190Kspeculative | $77K to $480K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.3 | +1.9 to +4.6 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | +0.8 | +6.6range +5.9 to +7.3 | 3,367 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Auburn | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.1 to -0.1 | Limited evidence | -1.1 | +0.0 | +0.3range +0.2 to +0.4 | 306 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:21 | 30:57 | 19:46–39:47 | |
| Points | 18.2 | 15.3 | 4.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.2% | 49.5% | 11.1%–83.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Charlotte | L 78–83 | 32:48 | 9 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 42.9% |
| 2026-03-08 | East Carolina | W 90–83 | 34:45 | 22 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8-11 | 0-2 | 6-7 | 72.7% |
| 2026-03-04 | Charlotte | W 80–74 | 37:19 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 0-2 | 8-8 | 46.2% |
| 2026-03-01 | North Texas | L 58–62 | 31:56 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 6-12 | 0-2 | 5-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | Memphis | W 78–67 | 34:57 | 23 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 10-13 | 59.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Temple | W 76–71 | 35:10 | 24 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 2-4 | 6-7 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-15 | Tulane | L 54–55 | 35:35 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-6 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Tulsa | W 68–63 | 32:00 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-10 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Rice | W 71–65 | 33:39 | 22 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-17 | 3-6 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Memphis | L 80–90 | 34:31 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-7 | 6-12 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | North Texas | W 72–68 | 35:43 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9-11 | 0-1 | 0-3 | 81.8% |
| 2026-01-28 | UTSA | W 83–73 | 33:56 | 14 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | South Fla. | L 69–82 | 26:30 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-14 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 32.1% |
| 2026-01-18 | Tulsa | L 77–99 | 31:32 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | Tulane | W 82–69 | 30:41 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-11 | East Carolina | W 87–85 | 26:29 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-07 | Fla. Atlantic | L 71–76 | 31:46 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | South Fla. | W 109–106 | 39:47 | 24 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 0-1 | 8-13 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-31 | Wichita St. | L 70–75 | 30:42 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | UNC Asheville | W 72–47 | 31:02 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-17 | Cleveland St. | W 101–77 | 30:00 | 31 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12-15 | 1-1 | 6-9 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-14 | Troy | L 85–86 | 19:54 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 4-5 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-05 | Drake | W 74–69 | 25:35 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6-11 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 59.1% |
| 2025-12-01 | Middle Tenn. | L 61–76 | 29:08 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3-11 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | UTEP | W 75–59 | 30:48 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-2 | 6-10 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Southern Ill. | W 81–73 | 33:34 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-9 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 11.1% |
| 2025-11-21 | South Alabama | W 80–72 | 34:31 | 10 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-9 | 0-5 | 6-9 | 22.2% |
| 2025-11-14 | High Point | W 91–74 | 19:46 | 22 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 10-13 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Alabama St. | L 74–77 | 27:38 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10-16 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-07 | NC State | L 70–94 | 27:42 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-03 | Mississippi Val. | W 106–55 | 19:55 | 23 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8-12 | 3-5 | 4-8 | 79.2% |