Dezayne Mingo
Charlotte · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
876:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 27:23
- Points per game
- 12.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.4 / 4.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.6 | 3.4 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.4 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 2.8 |
| Season totals | 402 | 108 | 144 | 30 | 1 | 64 | 61 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 131–304 | 43.1% | 9.5 | 13.9 |
| 2P | 77–163 | 47.2% | 5.1 | 7.4 |
| 3P | 54–141 | 38.3% | 4.4 | 6.4 |
| FT | 86–114 | 75.4% | 3.6 | 5.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.0% | 56.8% | 46.4% | 37.5% | 2.25 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Charlotte · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $130K
- 80% range $38K to $335K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.0%
- team pool $855K, 80% range $370K to $1.85M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $100K to $140K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 64.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Charlotte: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Charlotte | $130Kspeculative | $38K to $335K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.5 | -0.0 to +2.9 | Sufficient evidence | +2.5 | -1.0 | +4.8range +4.1 to +5.4 | 2,711 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Marshall | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.3 | -1.2 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | -0.7 | +4.0range +3.4 to +4.8 | 2,980 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:24 | 27:23 | 7:16–37:55 | |
| Points | 16.8 | 12.6 | 0.0–35.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.0% | 53.5% | 0.0%–88.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | South Fla. | L 64–86 | 36:45 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-12 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 29.2% |
| 2026-03-13 | UAB | W 83–78 | 37:55 | 35 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 11-17 | 8-11 | 5-9 | 88.2% |
| 2026-03-12 | Tulane | W 74–60 | 35:54 | 19 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-17 | 2-10 | 7-7 | 35.3% |
| 2026-03-08 | South Fla. | L 60–83 | 24:52 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 70.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | UAB | L 74–80 | 36:35 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-16 | 2-9 | 1-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | North Texas | W 80–79 | 7:16 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | East Carolina | W 68–56 | 32:47 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-12 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-18 | Tulsa | L 74–79 | 28:53 | 19 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 5-5 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-15 | UTSA | L 79–88 | 14:23 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | Memphis | L 54–77 | 23:21 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-04 | Wichita St. | L 64–74 | 28:18 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9-15 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-30 | Rice | W 80–70 | 31:51 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-3 | 4-6 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Temple | W 80–76 | 34:00 | 19 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 8-9 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-23 | Tulane | W 73–70 | 25:34 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-18 | East Carolina | W 73–70 | 27:19 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 6-7 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-14 | Tulsa | L 74–86 | 21:51 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Rice | W 74–73 | 21:02 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | UTSA | W 74–58 | 23:37 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-7 | 2-5 | 4-5 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | Wichita St. | W 104–100 | 32:57 | 26 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8-14 | 4-6 | 6-6 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-30 | Temple | L 73–76 | 25:33 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-21 | UIC | W 88–76 | 23:20 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 35.7% |
| 2025-12-18 | Lafayette | W 81–67 | 17:14 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-14 | Col. of Charleston | L 67–74 | 20:13 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Utah St. | L 53–79 | 28:09 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | N.C. A&T | W 74–57 | 27:38 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Richmond | L 66–71 | 31:58 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-13 | 2-9 | 1-2 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-27 | Illinois St. | L 69–79 | 15:10 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | App State | L 63–65 | 32:31 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-11 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Virginia Tech | L 76–84 | 33:22 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-15 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-11 | Davidson | L 55–62 | 32:04 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 2-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-07 | Tennessee Tech | W 70–65 | 31:40 | 13 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-9 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-03 | Indiana St. | W 92–76 | 32:05 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 0-1 | 7-7 | 45.5% |