Anton Bonke
Charlotte · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
852:02 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 25:49
- Points per game
- 10.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 8.1 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.4 | 8.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.1 | 12.6 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 342 | 268 | 35 | 8 | 49 | 49 | 74 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 134–234 | 57.3% | 7.1 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 121–196 | 61.7% | 5.9 | 9.2 |
| 3P | 13–38 | 34.2%† | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| FT | 61–92 | 66.3% | 2.8 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.0% | 62.3% | 16.2% | 39.3% | 0.71 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Charlotte · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $240K
- 80% range $84K to $690K
- Median share of team pool
- 26.4%
- team pool $855K, 80% range $370K to $1.85M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $185K to $260K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 63.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Charlotte: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Charlotte | $240Kspeculative | $84K to $690K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.3 | +2.0 to +4.7 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | +1.8 | +5.5range +4.9 to +6.1 | 2,668 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:50 | 25:49 | 13:05–43:03 | |
| Points | 9.0 | 10.4 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 47.4% | 57.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | South Fla. | L 64–86 | 28:42 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 56.3% |
| 2026-03-13 | UAB | W 83–78 | 22:47 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Tulane | W 74–60 | 32:07 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2026-03-08 | South Fla. | L 60–83 | 29:43 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | UAB | L 74–80 | 30:51 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 64.3% |
| 2026-03-01 | Fla. Atlantic | L 76–77 | 38:02 | 20 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8-10 | 1-3 | 3-4 | 85.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | North Texas | W 80–79 | 29:42 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-21 | East Carolina | W 68–56 | 20:55 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-18 | Tulsa | L 74–79 | 28:18 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 70.8% |
| 2026-02-15 | UTSA | L 79–88 | 30:56 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-08 | Memphis | L 54–77 | 15:55 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Wichita St. | L 64–74 | 29:22 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | Rice | W 80–70 | 27:49 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Temple | W 80–76 | 33:21 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11-14 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-23 | Tulane | W 73–70 | 13:05 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-18 | East Carolina | W 73–70 | 22:17 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-14 | Tulsa | L 74–86 | 24:24 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-11 | Rice | W 74–73 | 14:24 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | UTSA | W 74–58 | 19:54 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Wichita St. | W 104–100 | 43:03 | 16 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8-12 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-30 | Temple | L 73–76 | 24:44 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 10-13 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | UIC | W 88–76 | 26:03 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Lafayette | W 81–67 | 21:55 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2-9 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-14 | Col. of Charleston | L 67–74 | 31:34 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-07 | Utah St. | L 53–79 | 24:02 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | N.C. A&T | W 74–57 | 20:14 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-28 | Richmond | L 66–71 | 19:59 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-27 | Illinois St. | L 69–79 | 13:52 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | App State | L 63–65 | 27:37 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-8 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 81.3% |
| 2025-11-16 | Virginia Tech | L 76–84 | 24:47 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 72.2% |
| 2025-11-11 | Davidson | L 55–62 | 31:53 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Tennessee Tech | W 70–65 | 21:02 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Indiana St. | W 92–76 | 28:43 | 10 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 90.0% |