Tidjiane Dioumassi
Western Caro. · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
677:30 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 24:12
- Points per game
- 9.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.0 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.9 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 4.6 |
| Season totals | 253 | 78 | 73 | 18 | 1 | 49 | 78 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 97–218 | 44.5% | 7.8 | 12.9 |
| 2P | 73–154 | 47.4% | 5.5 | 9.1 |
| 3P | 24–64 | 37.5% | 2.3 | 3.8 |
| FT | 35–49 | 71.4% | 1.8 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.0% | 52.8% | 29.4% | 22.5% | 1.49 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
W Carolina · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $17K
- 80% range $2K to $59K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.9%
- team pool $195K, 80% range $71K to $520K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $17K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
W Carolina: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | W Carolina | $17Kspeculative | $2K to $59K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.2 | -1.5 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.0 | +3.4range +2.7 to +3.9 | 2,324 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Southern Univ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.5 | +0.0 to +0.9 | Limited evidence | -0.3 | +0.8 | +0.7range +0.7 to +0.8 | 421 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Southern Univ | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.2 | -1.3 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +1.0 | +2.6range +2.0 to +3.1 | 2,826 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:54 | 24:12 | 7:42–38:51 | |
| Points | 15.6 | 9.0 | 0.0–21.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 49.3% | 49.7% | 16.7%–91.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | ETSU | L 67–69 | 23:13 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-12 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-07 | Mercer | W 77–73 | 34:03 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-16 | 4-6 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Furman | W 86–67 | 31:17 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Mercer | W 78–74 | 28:13 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-13 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 34.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | VMI | W 81–62 | 32:45 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-18 | UNC Greensboro | W 91–77 | 31:28 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-14 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 53.6% |
| 2026-02-14 | Chattanooga | W 81–76 | 26:45 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 54.2% |
| 2026-02-11 | The Citadel | W 87–49 | 22:06 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | UNC Greensboro | L 78–81 | 16:39 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-01 | Samford | L 74–88 | 23:43 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-29 | ETSU | W 90–88 | 20:13 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 91.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | VMI | W 88–58 | 25:38 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Mercer | L 76–88 | 15:07 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Chattanooga | L 82–90 | 20:51 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-14 | ETSU | W 72–68 | 29:50 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | The Citadel | L 77–79 | 34:37 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Samford | L 77–82 | 31:21 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | Furman | W 80–77 | 38:51 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Wofford | L 74–79 | 28:42 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-2 | 5-8 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Georgia | L 82–112 | 27:37 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-11 | Virginia Tech | L 74–96 | 18:31 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | USC Upstate | L 67–78 | 18:43 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-29 | High Point | L 73–93 | 19:22 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Lipscomb | L 62–83 | 24:43 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | UNC Asheville | W 80–73 | 20:04 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Stetson | W 76–65 | 15:30 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Duke | L 54–95 | 9:56 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Cincinnati | L 63–94 | 7:42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |