Jimel Lane
Grambling · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
574:51 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 22:07
- Points per game
- 7.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.5 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 7.6 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.8 | 8.1 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 198 | 117 | 26 | 24 | 12 | 42 | 50 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 71–168 | 42.3% | 6.5 | 11.7 |
| 2P | 63–135 | 46.7% | 5.2 | 9.4 |
| 3P | 8–33 | 24.2%† | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| FT | 48–61 | 78.7% | 2.3 | 4.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.6% | 50.8% | 19.6% | 36.3% | 0.62 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Grambling · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $8K
- 80% range $1K to $32K
- Median share of team pool
- 6.4%
- team pool $180K, 80% range $69K to $485K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $8K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 45.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Grambling: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Grambling | $8Kspeculative | $1K to $32K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.9 | -2.0 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -0.9 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.1 | 1,711 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Northwestern LA | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -4.2 | -5.4 to -2.7 | Sufficient evidence | -1.5 | -2.7 | +0.5range +0.2 to +1.0 | 1,266 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 17:01 | 22:07 | 6:49–34:33 | |
| Points | 4.4 | 7.6 | 0.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 45.1% | 44.1% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | Jackson St. | L 65–68 | 9:55 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-09 | Mississippi Val. | W 77–52 | 19:21 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2026-03-05 | Alabama St. | W 65–63 | 9:47 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-03 | Alabama A&M | L 63–77 | 18:14 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Florida A&M | L 59–66 | 27:49 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Bethune-Cookman | L 71–76 | 32:12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | Mississippi Val. | W 83–62 | 33:02 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7-11 | 1-1 | 3-6 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-21 | Southern U. | L 73–87 | 29:07 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-16 | Prairie View | L 63–68 | 25:50 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Texas Southern | L 79–82 | 29:44 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-17 | Southern U. | L 53–71 | 21:37 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 28.6% |
| 2026-01-12 | Florida A&M | L 84–91 | 28:42 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Bethune-Cookman | L 65–74 | 21:23 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | Texas Southern | W 84–67 | 18:21 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Prairie View | W 76–72 | 15:41 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-23 | Ohio St. | L 63–89 | 11:31 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | Hampton | W 81–72 | 21:08 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 | 3-5 | 42.9% |
| 2025-12-18 | Norfolk St. | W 80–68 | 11:18 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-08 | Southern Miss. | L 60–68 | 6:49 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Tulane | L 63–65 | 26:59 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | UC Riverside | L 74–83 | 20:32 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | California Baptist | L 59–72 | 25:26 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-8 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 18.8% |
| 2025-11-18 | San Diego | L 68–78 | 20:13 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 14.3% |
| 2025-11-13 | Southern Miss. | W 75–70 | 34:33 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-09 · NCAA | Howard | W 73–70 | 32:12 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7-14 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-06 | Iowa St. | L 62–102 | 23:25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 30.0% |