Canin Jefferson
North Ala. · 2025–26 · 20 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
609:02 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 20
- Minutes per game
- 30:27
- Points per game
- 12.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.9 / 2.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.7 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.7 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 254 | 38 | 57 | 26 | 2 | 44 | 48 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 83–205 | 40.5% | 10.3 | 13.5 |
| 2P | 56–112 | 50.0% | 5.6 | 7.4 |
| 3P | 27–93 | 29.0% | 4.7 | 6.1 |
| FT | 61–80 | 76.3% | 4.0 | 5.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.1% | 52.9% | 45.4% | 39.0% | 1.30 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
North Alabama · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $10K
- 80% range $1K to $44K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.6%
- team pool $190K, 80% range $71K to $515K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $10K to $11K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 60.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
North Alabama: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | North Alabama | $10Kspeculative | $1K to $44K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.4 | -2.4 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -1.6 | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.4 | 1,751 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | North Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.1 | -2.6 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | -1.0 | +1.3range +0.9 to +1.6 | 1,191 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | North Alabama | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.8 | -1.6 to +0.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.8 | +0.7range +0.6 to +0.9 | 725 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 24:54 | 30:27 | 17:52–39:53 | |
| Points | 9.6 | 12.7 | 4.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.1% | 47.3% | 25.0%–73.1% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | FGCU | L 58–69 | 18:40 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-09 | Central Ark. | L 65–72 | 22:30 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 3-5 | 41.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Stetson | W 68–66 | 37:44 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-29 | FGCU | L 64–72 | 27:38 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-10 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Queens (NC) | L 62–87 | 17:57 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Jacksonville | L 68–90 | 33:54 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | North Florida | L 91–105 | 34:56 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8-13 | 3-6 | 2-3 | 73.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Bellarmine | W 82–73 | 32:34 | 17 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-6 | 6-6 | 45.8% |
| 2026-01-08 | Eastern Ky. | L 80–88 | 36:20 | 24 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 4-8 | 6-8 | 69.2% |
| 2026-01-03 · NCAA | FGCU | L 55–72 | 32:24 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-12 | 0-3 | 6-8 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-01 | Stetson | L 67–70 | 34:12 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-15 | 2-9 | 3-3 | 46.7% |
| 2025-12-19 | LMU (CA) | L 57–91 | 26:52 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-15 | Alabama A&M | L 60–68 | 38:03 | 20 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 6-9 | 53.8% |
| 2025-12-03 | San Francisco | W 65–63 | 30:33 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 31.8% |
| 2025-12-01 | Jacksonville St. | W 73–66 | 37:31 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-9 | 3-6 | 5-6 | 61.1% |
| 2025-11-22 | Chattanooga | L 57–71 | 28:14 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Clemson | L 61–81 | 17:52 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-15 | ETSU | L 74–78 | 34:11 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4-10 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | Northwestern St. | W 87–83 | 39:53 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-15 | 1-5 | 3-5 | 36.7% |
| 2025-11-05 | Mississippi St. | L 62–86 | 27:04 | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5-17 | 4-9 | 2-3 | 41.2% |