A'lahn Sumler
Charleston So. · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
819:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 30:22
- Points per game
- 19.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.6 / 3.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.3 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 25.4 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 521 | 125 | 104 | 21 | 4 | 67 | 59 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 187–389 | 48.1% | 14.4 | 19.0 |
| 2P | 128–244 | 52.5% | 9.0 | 11.9 |
| 3P | 59–145 | 40.7% | 5.4 | 7.1 |
| FT | 88–134 | 65.7% | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.7% | 58.2% | 37.3% | 34.4% | 1.55 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Charleston So · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $27K
- 80% range $7K to $84K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.6%
- team pool $190K, 80% range $70K to $495K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $29K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 69.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Charleston So: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Charleston So | $27Kspeculative | $7K to $84K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.8 | -0.3 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.6 | -0.8 | +4.4range +3.9 to +5.0 | 3,024 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Charleston So | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.4 to -0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -1.4 | +1.5range +1.1 to +1.9 | 2,118 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | N Kentucky | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.0 to +0.2 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | -0.7 | +0.8range +0.6 to +1.1 | 700 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:49 | 30:22 | 20:47–43:18 | |
| Points | 22.2 | 19.3 | 5.0–35.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.2% | 56.9% | 33.3%–103.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Winthrop | L 81–86 | 32:28 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-16 | 2-6 | 6-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | UNC Asheville | W 92–75 | 24:14 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5-9 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | Winthrop | W 86–84 | 34:44 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7-22 | 3-9 | 3-6 | 38.6% |
| 2026-02-21 | Longwood | L 96–107 | 36:18 | 29 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 10-19 | 2-6 | 7-8 | 57.9% |
| 2026-02-17 | Gardner-Webb | W 75–66 | 26:22 | 27 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-22 | 1-5 | 6-7 | 47.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Radford | L 80–90 | 25:31 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-17 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 44.1% |
| 2026-02-12 | Presbyterian | W 84–67 | 21:07 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Radford | L 75–84 | 39:26 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-18 | 2-8 | 12-16 | 44.4% |
| 2026-01-23 | Longwood | L 79–81 | 43:18 | 30 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 11-18 | 7-13 | 1-3 | 80.6% |
| 2026-01-21 | Presbyterian | L 83–87 | 37:34 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10-21 | 5-9 | 1-2 | 59.5% |
| 2026-01-14 | USC Upstate | L 81–86 | 38:46 | 35 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 12-19 | 3-6 | 8-13 | 71.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | High Point | L 82–84 | 39:27 | 19 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7-20 | 2-10 | 3-4 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Winthrop | L 77–81 | 34:30 | 22 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-15 | 1-4 | 3-3 | 63.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | UNC Asheville | W 86–83 | 30:29 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-13 | 1-4 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Gardner-Webb | W 89–79 | 33:42 | 29 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10-19 | 4-7 | 5-6 | 63.2% |
| 2025-12-28 | Richmond | W 77–72 | 28:04 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-13 | 1-4 | 4-6 | 42.3% |
| 2025-12-21 | Furman | L 76–84 | 29:49 | 26 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11-20 | 3-8 | 1-3 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-18 | North Florida | W 113–90 | 20:47 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-7 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 78.6% |
| 2025-12-08 | South Carolina St. | W 84–44 | 21:04 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 4-4 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | UT Martin | L 56–73 | 22:33 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3-9 | 0-2 | 1-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-28 | South Carolina | L 62–74 | 29:35 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6-14 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 46.4% |
| 2025-11-21 | East Carolina | W 77–65 | 27:09 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | IU Indy | W 103–91 | 26:31 | 29 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11-13 | 5-6 | 2-6 | 103.8% |
| 2025-11-14 | Lindenwood | L 77–83 | 29:42 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | Alabama A&M | L 64–68 | 33:30 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-10 | The Citadel | W 96–86 | 30:05 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-5 | 4-8 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-03 | Virginia Tech | L 67–98 | 23:14 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-15 | 2-4 | 3-5 | 33.3% |