Jadis Jones
Lindenwood · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
864:57 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 34:36
- Points per game
- 15.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 8.8 / 2.6
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.5 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 3.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 17.9 | 10.1 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 3.5 |
| Season totals | 387 | 219 | 64 | 32 | 21 | 41 | 75 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 151–272 | 55.5% | 10.9 | 12.6 |
| 2P | 151–264 | 57.2% | 10.6 | 12.2 |
| 3P | 0–8 | 0.0%† | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| FT | 85–141 | 60.3% | 5.6 | 6.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55.5% | 57.9% | 2.9% | 51.8% | 1.56 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Lindenwood · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $47K
- 80% range $16K to $140K
- Median share of team pool
- 21.3%
- team pool $210K, 80% range $76K to $560K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $39K to $50K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 77.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Lindenwood: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Lindenwood | $47Kspeculative | $16K to $140K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.5 to +3.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | +1.5 | +5.6range +5.0 to +6.3 | 2,928 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Lindenwood | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.6 | -1.6 to +0.9 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | +0.8 | +3.4range +2.8 to +4.2 | 3,302 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:22 | 34:36 | 25:23–38:46 | |
| Points | 12.6 | 15.5 | 7.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 42.9% | 57.0% | 25.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 66–68 | 30:48 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 6-10 | 44.4% |
| 2026-03-04 | Little Rock | W 72–62 | 37:42 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8-18 | 0-1 | 2-9 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Western Ill. | W 91–69 | 32:29 | 12 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Eastern Ill. | L 67–71 | 38:23 | 11 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5-14 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Tennessee Tech | L 57–72 | 37:28 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Tennessee St. | L 80–89 | 38:46 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 61–73 | 37:52 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | UT Martin | W 75–74 | 37:07 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 6-6 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-05 | Little Rock | W 79–74 | 33:48 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3-12 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | SIUE | L 72–78 | 37:10 | 23 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 5-11 | 81.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | Tennessee St. | L 86–96 | 32:22 | 21 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 9-11 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-22 | Tennessee Tech | W 89–68 | 29:39 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | UT Martin | L 55–69 | 35:06 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Southeast Mo. St. | W 88–76 | 36:56 | 20 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8-14 | 0-0 | 4-8 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-10 | Little Rock | L 74–82 | 36:13 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-13 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-06 | SIUE | L 62–66 | 34:38 | 22 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 10-18 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 55.6% |
| 2025-12-23 | Missouri St. | L 65–70 | 36:13 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 4-8 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-18 | Western Ill. | W 92–76 | 34:16 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 8-12 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | Eastern Ill. | W 82–74 | 37:44 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9-12 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | NIU | W 99–64 | 30:20 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-5 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-24 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 80–67 | 33:42 | 19 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-13 | 0-0 | 7-8 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-20 | Indiana | L 53–73 | 32:57 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 6-9 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Alabama A&M | L 65–74 | 25:23 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Charleston So. | W 83–77 | 36:33 | 30 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 12-17 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 70.6% |
| 2025-11-10 | Saint Louis | L 66–109 | 31:22 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 88.9% |