Anias Futrell
Lindenwood · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
954:55 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 32:56
- Points per game
- 17.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.0 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.4 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.2 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 506 | 175 | 56 | 62 | 25 | 76 | 70 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 168–408 | 41.2% | 14.1 | 17.1 |
| 2P | 97–206 | 47.1% | 7.1 | 8.6 |
| 3P | 71–202 | 35.1% | 7.0 | 8.5 |
| FT | 99–119 | 83.2% | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.9% | 55.0% | 49.5% | 29.2% | 0.74 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Lindenwood · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $34K
- 80% range $11K to $100K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.1%
- team pool $210K, 80% range $76K to $560K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $28K to $37K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 80.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Lindenwood: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Lindenwood | $34Kspeculative | $11K to $100K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.8 | +0.0 to +1.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +0.3 | +5.3range +4.8 to +5.9 | 3,029 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Lindenwood | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.1 | +0.3 | +3.1range +2.6 to +3.6 | 2,633 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:44 | 32:56 | 21:19–39:57 | |
| Points | 16.0 | 17.4 | 4.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 41.4% | 47.1% | 14.3%–80.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 66–68 | 28:05 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-14 | 2-7 | 7-7 | 35.7% |
| 2026-03-04 | Little Rock | W 72–62 | 21:19 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 22.2% |
| 2026-02-28 | Western Ill. | W 91–69 | 32:30 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8-18 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-26 | Eastern Ill. | L 67–71 | 38:43 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 9-17 | 2-7 | 7-8 | 58.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Tennessee Tech | L 57–72 | 38:03 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4-14 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 32.1% |
| 2026-02-19 | Tennessee St. | L 80–89 | 36:55 | 27 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 9-16 | 5-9 | 4-6 | 71.9% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 61–73 | 39:43 | 22 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-18 | 1-7 | 5-7 | 47.2% |
| 2026-02-12 | UT Martin | W 75–74 | 23:32 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Little Rock | W 79–74 | 39:06 | 24 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 8-18 | 6-9 | 2-4 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-03 | SIUE | L 72–78 | 30:32 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6-17 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 41.2% |
| 2026-01-31 | Morehead St. | W 79–78 | 39:57 | 26 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7-17 | 5-10 | 7-8 | 55.9% |
| 2026-01-29 | Southern Ind. | W 73–60 | 38:38 | 20 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5-14 | 2-5 | 8-9 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-24 | Tennessee St. | L 86–96 | 39:14 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9-21 | 3-9 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Tennessee Tech | W 89–68 | 32:09 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 9-15 | 4-10 | 3-3 | 73.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | UT Martin | L 55–69 | 36:35 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-11 | 0-4 | 6-6 | 18.2% |
| 2026-01-15 | Southeast Mo. St. | W 88–76 | 39:23 | 28 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8-13 | 5-9 | 7-7 | 80.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Little Rock | L 74–82 | 39:51 | 30 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 11-21 | 5-13 | 3-3 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | SIUE | L 62–66 | 36:02 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Southern Ind. | W 83–80 | 37:55 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-16 | 2-5 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Morehead St. | W 77–64 | 32:17 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 7-10 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | Missouri St. | L 65–70 | 34:59 | 6 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-11 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 18.2% |
| 2025-12-18 | Western Ill. | W 92–76 | 32:48 | 36 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14-25 | 8-13 | 0-2 | 72.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Eastern Ill. | W 82–74 | 31:13 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-02 | NIU | W 99–64 | 23:04 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-14 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 53.6% |
| 2025-11-24 · NCAA | Kansas City | W 80–67 | 25:36 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 40.9% |
| 2025-11-20 | Indiana | L 53–73 | 27:36 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4-15 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-16 | Alabama A&M | L 65–74 | 23:57 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-8 | 2-5 | 4-5 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Charleston So. | W 83–77 | 27:08 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-7 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 14.3% |
| 2025-11-10 | Saint Louis | L 66–109 | 28:05 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-11 | 1-6 | 3-5 | 22.7% |