Christian Anderson
Texas Tech · 2025–26 · 33 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1267:13 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 33
- Minutes per game
- 38:24
- Points per game
- 18.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 7.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 18.5 | 3.6 | 7.4 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.3 | 3.7 | 7.7 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 2.1 |
| Season totals | 611 | 118 | 244 | 48 | 8 | 109 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 204–432 | 47.2% | 13.1 | 13.6 |
| 2P | 96–172 | 55.8% | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| 3P | 108–260 | 41.5% | 7.9 | 8.2 |
| FT | 95–118 | 80.5% | 3.6 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59.7% | 63.1% | 60.2% | 27.3% | 2.24 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Texas Tech · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $815K
- 80% range $565K to $1.20M
- Median share of team pool
- 22.5%
- team pool $3.55M, 80% range $2.60M to $5.00M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $815K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 93.1%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Texas Tech: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Texas Tech | $815Kspeculative | $565K to $1.20M | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +4.4 | +3.4 to +5.5 | Sufficient evidence | +4.3 | +0.1 | +8.5range +7.8 to +9.4 | 4,053 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Texas Tech | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.5 | +1.3 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +3.0 | -0.5 | +4.4range +3.7 to +5.3 | 3,304 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:33 | 38:24 | 31:18–45:00 | |
| Points | 13.8 | 18.5 | 7.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 46.0% | 59.0% | 22.7%–86.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-22 | Alabama | L 65–90 | 36:53 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-11 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 22.7% |
| 2026-03-20 | Akron | W 91–71 | 39:35 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 58.3% |
| 2026-03-12 | Iowa St. | L 53–75 | 31:23 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | BYU | L 76–82 | 39:55 | 23 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8-19 | 6-12 | 1-2 | 57.9% |
| 2026-03-03 | TCU | L 65–73 | 39:59 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4-11 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-28 | Iowa St. | W 82–73 | 31:18 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 5-12 | 2-8 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | Cincinnati | W 80–68 | 39:48 | 31 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11-19 | 3-8 | 6-6 | 65.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Kansas St. | W 100–72 | 37:43 | 21 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-13 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 73.1% |
| 2026-02-17 | Arizona St. | L 67–72 | 37:51 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 6-10 | 4-7 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Arizona | W 78–75 | 45:00 | 19 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6-18 | 6-15 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Colorado | W 78–44 | 36:24 | 14 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | West Virginia | W 70–63 | 40:00 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4-8 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-31 | UCF | L 80–88 | 40:00 | 17 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-10 | 3-8 | 4-4 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Houston | W 90–86 | 39:58 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-7 | 7-8 | 27.8% |
| 2026-01-20 | Baylor | W 92–73 | 37:43 | 26 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9-15 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 86.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | BYU | W 84–71 | 39:51 | 22 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 4-10 | 6-6 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-14 | Utah | W 88–74 | 39:14 | 26 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9-16 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Colorado | W 73–71 | 40:00 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 1-3 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-06 | Houston | L 65–69 | 39:56 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-11 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Oklahoma St. | W 102–80 | 38:52 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7-15 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 56.7% |
| 2025-12-28 | Winthrop | W 87–57 | 36:52 | 29 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8-13 | 4-9 | 9-9 | 76.9% |
| 2025-12-20 | Duke | W 82–81 | 40:00 | 27 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 9-14 | 5-9 | 4-6 | 82.1% |
| 2025-12-16 | Northern Colo. | W 101–90 | 37:32 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Arkansas | L 86–93 | 39:57 | 26 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10-17 | 5-11 | 1-3 | 73.5% |
| 2025-12-07 | LSU | W 82–58 | 37:27 | 27 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9-16 | 5-9 | 4-7 | 71.9% |
| 2025-11-30 | Wyoming | W 76–72 | 40:00 | 15 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 6-8 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | LSU New Orleans | W 82–50 | 37:13 | 23 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8-13 | 6-9 | 1-2 | 84.6% |
| 2025-11-21 | Purdue | L 56–86 | 36:54 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-15 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 43.3% |
| 2025-11-20 | Wake Forest | W 84–83 | 38:50 | 16 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6-13 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 57.7% |
| 2025-11-14 | Milwaukee | W 80–63 | 39:12 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-13 | 4-9 | 4-4 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-11 | Illinois | L 77–81 | 38:56 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4-12 | 0-6 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-07 | Sam Houston | W 98–77 | 35:21 | 18 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 7-8 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-04 | Lindenwood | W 98–60 | 37:36 | 34 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11-23 | 3-7 | 9-11 | 54.3% |