Nick Anderson
Rice · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
872:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 30:04
- Points per game
- 16.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 1.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.0 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.3 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 3.0 |
| Season totals | 465 | 126 | 32 | 35 | 9 | 31 | 65 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 146–331 | 44.1% | 11.4 | 15.2 |
| 2P | 64–127 | 50.4% | 4.4 | 5.8 |
| 3P | 82–204 | 40.2% | 7.0 | 9.4 |
| FT | 91–113 | 80.5% | 3.9 | 5.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56.5% | 61.1% | 61.6% | 34.1% | 1.03 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Rice · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $145K
- 80% range $26K to $420K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.8%
- team pool $960K, 80% range $415K to $2.15M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $120K to $160K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 74.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Rice: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Rice | $145Kspeculative | $26K to $420K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.9 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | -1.7 | +4.1range +3.5 to +4.6 | 2,924 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:21 | 30:04 | 20:23–42:34 | |
| Points | 18.6 | 16.0 | 3.0–29.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 62.2% | 56.4% | 12.5%–81.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | UTSA | W 80–71 | 23:12 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7-14 | 6-12 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-04 | North Texas | L 58–62 | 34:58 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4-10 | 3-7 | 0-0 | 55.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | Temple | W 80–74 | 33:27 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 2-8 | 7-11 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-25 | South Fla. | L 56–75 | 34:40 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-6 | 3-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | Tulane | L 75–81 | 30:29 | 29 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-13 | 3-6 | 8-8 | 80.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | East Carolina | L 75–85 | 30:06 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-7 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 35.7% |
| 2026-02-11 | Fla. Atlantic | W 81–73 | 31:43 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 7-12 | 4-8 | 5-8 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-08 | UAB | L 65–71 | 32:56 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-14 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-04 | North Texas | W 86–83 | 42:34 | 22 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7-12 | 4-9 | 4-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-30 | Charlotte | L 70–80 | 29:36 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 4-11 | 4-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | East Carolina | W 83–77 | 33:29 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-11 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 81.8% |
| 2026-01-24 | Tulsa | L 81–87 | 24:28 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-14 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-21 | Temple | L 65–69 | 33:03 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-14 | UTSA | W 89–73 | 25:36 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-12 | 4-8 | 5-7 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-11 | Charlotte | L 73–74 | 34:44 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8-14 | 3-7 | 4-5 | 67.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Wichita St. | W 66–64 | 20:23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Memphis | L 70–76 | 34:22 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-15 | 4-11 | 3-4 | 46.7% |
| 2025-12-31 | Tulsa | L 48–97 | 25:25 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 5-6 | 46.2% |
| 2025-12-20 | Pepperdine | L 62–84 | 31:42 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1-11 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 13.6% |
| 2025-12-13 | Arkansas St. | W 77–76 | 23:28 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-11 | 3-8 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Texas St. | W 77–72 | 32:04 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4-13 | 2-9 | 5-6 | 38.5% |
| 2025-11-26 | Oral Roberts | W 81–62 | 35:09 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7-11 | 4-6 | 4-4 | 81.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | FGCU | L 63–78 | 33:18 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-8 | 0-4 | 8-8 | 12.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Kennesaw St. | L 84–89 | 35:33 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 6-6 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-20 | Tarleton St. | L 74–90 | 27:48 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 61.5% |
| 2025-11-17 | Tennessee | L 66–91 | 26:21 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-16 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 46.9% |
| 2025-11-14 | East Texas A&M | W 71–64 | 29:03 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 77.8% |
| 2025-11-11 | SFA | L 69–81 | 21:09 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-07 | Oregon | L 63–67 | 21:14 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-12 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 54.2% |