Jordan Williams
Rice · 2025–26 · 12 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
123:29 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 12
- Minutes per game
- 10:17
- Points per game
- 1.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 0.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 4.5 | 5.5 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 4.5 |
| Season totals | 14 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 14 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 3–18 | 16.7%† | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| 2P | 2–9 | 22.2%† | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| 3P | 1–9 | 11.1%† | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| FT | 7–9 | 77.8%† | 0.8 | 2.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.4%† | 31.9%† | 50.0%† | 50.0%† | 0.75 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Rice · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $10K
- 80% range $3K to $28K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.0%
- team pool $960K, 80% range $415K to $2.15M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $8K to $11K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $6K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 10.3%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Rice: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Rice | $10Kspeculative | $3K to $28K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -3.2 | -4.6 to -2.0 | Limited evidence | -1.9 | -1.3 | +0.4range +0.3 to +0.5 | 405 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2024 | Vanderbilt | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.4 | -2.3 to -0.5 | Sufficient evidence | -1.4 | -0.0 | +0.5range +0.4 to +0.7 | 800 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 13:05 | 10:17 | 4:49–18:02 | |
| Points | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.0–5.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 17.5% | 8.8% | 0.0%–62.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-24 | Tulsa | L 81–87 | 7:37 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Temple | L 65–69 | 18:02 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2026-01-14 | UTSA | W 89–73 | 12:50 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-11 | Charlotte | L 73–74 | 9:57 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-07 | Wichita St. | W 66–64 | 16:57 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Tulsa | L 48–97 | 12:55 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Pepperdine | L 62–84 | 4:49 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Arkansas St. | W 77–76 | 9:37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Texas St. | W 77–72 | 9:19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Oral Roberts | W 81–62 | 10:24 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | FGCU | L 63–78 | 6:13 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Kennesaw St. | L 84–89 | 4:49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |