Petar Majstorovic
Long Beach St. · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
951:05 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 31:42
- Points per game
- 14.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.3 / 1.8
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.4 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.2 | 8.0 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 4.0 |
| Season totals | 432 | 190 | 53 | 50 | 9 | 69 | 94 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 162–307 | 52.8% | 10.2 | 12.9 |
| 2P | 136–214 | 63.6% | 7.1 | 9.0 |
| 3P | 26–93 | 28.0% | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| FT | 82–107 | 76.6% | 3.6 | 4.5 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.0% | 61.0% | 30.3% | 34.9% | 0.77 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Long Beach St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $63K
- 80% range $20K to $210K
- Median share of team pool
- 23.0%
- team pool $245K, 80% range $92K to $675K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $62K to $64K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 76.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Long Beach St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Long Beach St | $63Kspeculative | $20K to $210K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.2 | +0.2 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.0 | +0.2 | +4.6range +4.2 to +5.1 | 2,958 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Syracuse | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.6 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | -0.2 | -0.2 | +1.3range +1.0 to +1.6 | 1,198 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 32:14 | 31:42 | 14:41–43:54 | |
| Points | 9.6 | 14.4 | 2.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.1% | 55.6% | 12.5%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Hawaii | W 84–75 | 38:26 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 62.5% |
| 2026-03-05 | UC Davis | L 70–76 | 39:31 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | CSU Bakersfield | W 88–87 | 39:26 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Cal Poly | L 92–102 | 29:05 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7-13 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | CSUN | L 76–78 | 14:41 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | UC Irvine | L 58–69 | 31:50 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-12 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | UC Davis | L 54–71 | 27:59 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 82–86 | 31:08 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-4 | 7-9 | 57.7% |
| 2026-02-05 | UC San Diego | L 74–77 | 35:19 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 0-3 | 9-10 | 38.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Hawaii | L 82–89 | 25:14 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-13 | 0-3 | 8-9 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-29 | UC Riverside | L 61–71 | 33:02 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-8 | 0-3 | 7-9 | 12.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | UC Santa Barbara | L 71–74 | 29:02 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 68.2% |
| 2026-01-22 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 61–71 | 26:51 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | CSUN | W 87–80 | 24:34 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 6-8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-15 | UC Riverside | W 88–73 | 31:55 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-12 | 2-2 | 6-8 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-10 | CSU Bakersfield | W 81–75 | 28:54 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9-12 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-08 | UC Irvine | L 64–74 | 33:14 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-11 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 59.1% |
| 2026-01-03 | Cal Poly | W 74–66 | 32:12 | 25 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 12-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 78.1% |
| 2025-12-21 | Iowa St. | L 60–91 | 30:08 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Pepperdine | W 81–78 | 35:28 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 54.2% |
| 2025-12-09 | San Jose St. | L 83–89 | 40:04 | 21 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8-16 | 1-7 | 4-4 | 53.1% |
| 2025-12-06 | UC San Diego | L 74–80 | 38:58 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6-10 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 80.0% |
| 2025-12-04 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 77–84 | 43:54 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-30 | San Diego | W 76–72 | 36:38 | 14 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6-13 | 1-6 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Portland | L 73–93 | 29:26 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-16 | 2-6 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-21 | Montana St. | L 72–78 | 26:58 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Illinois St. | L 80–82 | 35:58 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8-15 | 3-5 | 0-3 | 63.3% |
| 2025-11-12 | Pacific | L 66–69 | 27:38 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Fresno St. | L 62–82 | 28:59 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-10 | 0-5 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | San Diego St. | L 45–77 | 24:33 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 60.0% |