Gavin Sykes
Long Beach St. · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
877:50 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 33:46
- Points per game
- 19.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.0 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 19.7 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 23.3 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| Season totals | 511 | 78 | 39 | 8 | 7 | 32 | 29 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 175–376 | 46.5% | 14.5 | 17.1 |
| 2P | 115–217 | 53.0% | 8.3 | 9.9 |
| 3P | 60–159 | 37.7% | 6.1 | 7.2 |
| FT | 101–126 | 80.2% | 4.8 | 5.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.5% | 59.2% | 42.3% | 33.5% | 1.22 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Long Beach St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $4K to $88K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.6%
- team pool $245K, 80% range $92K to $675K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $28K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 70.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Long Beach St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Long Beach St | $28Kspeculative | $4K to $88K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.2 | -1.0 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.7 | -0.8 | +3.9range +3.4 to +4.2 | 2,729 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:46 | 33:46 | 7:52–40:35 | |
| Points | 26.0 | 19.7 | 0.0–39.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.7% | 51.3% | 0.0%–76.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Hawaii | W 84–75 | 37:48 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10-17 | 5-8 | 9-14 | 73.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | CSU Bakersfield | W 88–87 | 40:00 | 39 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14-21 | 4-6 | 7-8 | 76.2% |
| 2026-02-26 | Cal Poly | L 92–102 | 28:45 | 28 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9-22 | 5-11 | 5-6 | 52.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | CSUN | L 76–78 | 33:49 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3-14 | 1-5 | 6-8 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | UC Irvine | L 58–69 | 38:29 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-12 | 0-4 | 6-7 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | UC Davis | L 54–71 | 36:02 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-13 | 3-6 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 82–86 | 32:07 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | UC Santa Barbara | L 71–74 | 38:57 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 14.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 61–71 | 37:33 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | CSUN | W 87–80 | 38:06 | 34 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 8-18 | 3-9 | 15-16 | 52.8% |
| 2026-01-15 | UC Riverside | W 88–73 | 33:52 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | CSU Bakersfield | W 81–75 | 38:49 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-13 | 3-6 | 5-7 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-08 | UC Irvine | L 64–74 | 39:08 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-13 | 2-5 | 3-5 | 69.2% |
| 2026-01-03 | Cal Poly | W 74–66 | 31:54 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-13 | 3-7 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Iowa St. | L 60–91 | 34:26 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-19 | 1-8 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-18 | Pepperdine | W 81–78 | 33:37 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-16 | 2-3 | 3-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-09 | San Jose St. | L 83–89 | 40:35 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11-23 | 4-9 | 0-0 | 56.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | UC San Diego | L 74–80 | 36:11 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-18 | 1-7 | 5-7 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-04 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 77–84 | 35:06 | 24 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-21 | 4-11 | 4-5 | 47.6% |
| 2025-11-30 | San Diego | W 76–72 | 35:13 | 30 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12-22 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 65.9% |
| 2025-11-26 | Portland | L 73–93 | 27:55 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 55.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Montana St. | L 72–78 | 33:59 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-16 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-16 | Illinois St. | L 80–82 | 31:52 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 45.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Pacific | L 66–69 | 30:57 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-15 | 4-10 | 4-4 | 53.3% |
| 2025-11-08 | Fresno St. | L 62–82 | 24:48 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | San Diego St. | L 45–77 | 7:52 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |