Sonny Wilson
Toledo · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1157:38 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 36:11
- Points per game
- 17.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.8 / 4.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.2 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.0 | 4.2 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| Season totals | 549 | 121 | 144 | 44 | 1 | 53 | 43 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 210–427 | 49.2% | 13.3 | 14.8 |
| 2P | 169–324 | 52.2% | 10.1 | 11.2 |
| 3P | 41–103 | 39.8% | 3.2 | 3.6 |
| FT | 88–127 | 69.3% | 4.0 | 4.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.0% | 56.8% | 24.1% | 29.7% | 2.72 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Toledo · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $37K
- 80% range $10K to $115K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.7%
- team pool $305K, 80% range $110K to $825K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $34K to $39K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 92.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Toledo: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Toledo | $37Kspeculative | $10K to $115K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.9 | +0.1 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | -1.5 | +6.9range +6.2 to +7.5 | 3,718 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Toledo | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.5 | -1.5 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | +2.4 | -2.9 | +3.7range +3.2 to +4.5 | 3,203 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Toledo | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -0.8 to +1.1 | Sufficient evidence | +0.2 | -0.0 | +3.2range +2.6 to +3.8 | 2,632 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 37:29 | 36:11 | 18:28–39:44 | |
| Points | 14.8 | 17.2 | 7.0–29.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.2% | 54.6% | 21.4%–94.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | Akron | L 76–79 | 39:05 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-14 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 21.4% |
| 2026-03-13 | Massachusetts | W 77–67 | 38:30 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-9 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 94.4% |
| 2026-03-12 | Bowling Green | W 77–76 | 38:19 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-16 | 0-2 | 2-6 | 31.3% |
| 2026-03-06 | Buffalo | W 99–78 | 34:54 | 24 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10-14 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 85.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | Miami (OH) | L 72–74 | 36:35 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6-15 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Ohio | W 79–67 | 36:53 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7-15 | 1-4 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-24 | NIU | W 79–69 | 36:08 | 17 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-13 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Eastern Mich. | W 94–75 | 30:12 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-11 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 68.2% |
| 2026-02-14 | Bowling Green | L 70–80 | 38:45 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-14 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 64.3% |
| 2026-02-11 | Western Mich. | W 90–79 | 37:04 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 5-9 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | James Madison | L 71–73 | 39:44 | 20 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-14 | 1-3 | 3-3 | 60.7% |
| 2026-02-03 | Kent St. | L 72–75 | 36:42 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-17 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 35.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Ball St. | W 73–55 | 35:06 | 19 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-15 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 56.7% |
| 2026-01-27 | Akron | L 81–91 | 38:33 | 22 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-15 | 3-4 | 5-6 | 56.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Bowling Green | W 73–72 | 38:38 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-12 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 29.2% |
| 2026-01-20 | Massachusetts | L 82–84 | 38:03 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7-14 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 53.6% |
| 2026-01-16 | Kent St. | L 84–87 | 38:42 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 53.8% |
| 2026-01-13 | Ohio | W 101–85 | 37:27 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-14 | 1-3 | 6-6 | 67.9% |
| 2026-01-09 | Miami (OH) | L 73–87 | 38:52 | 20 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8-13 | 1-2 | 3-5 | 65.4% |
| 2026-01-06 | NIU | W 75–61 | 37:00 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-16 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Central Mich. | W 78–75 | 37:37 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-15 | 0-1 | 4-5 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-30 | Western Mich. | W 84–79 | 37:26 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-1 | 8-13 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Michigan St. | L 69–92 | 35:27 | 29 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10-15 | 3-4 | 6-8 | 76.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | Robert Morris | L 70–75 | 18:28 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-13 | 2-4 | 7-8 | 53.8% |
| 2025-12-06 | Oakland | L 97–98 | 36:21 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7-13 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Belmont | L 72–87 | 37:03 | 13 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-24 | Troy | W 75–68 | 35:51 | 23 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10-13 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 84.6% |
| 2025-11-19 | Youngstown St. | W 92–75 | 32:20 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-14 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 32.1% |
| 2025-11-15 | Detroit Mercy | W 90–83 | 36:28 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-5 | 7-11 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-11 | Wright St. | W 81–71 | 36:00 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8-14 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 60.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | Marshall | L 73–85 | 31:18 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Alabama | L 74–76 | 38:07 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-11 | 3-7 | 2-2 | 59.1% |