Leroy Blyden Jr.
Toledo · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
1085:03 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 33:54
- Points per game
- 16.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.1 / 4.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.5 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.4 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 2.2 | 3.4 |
| Season totals | 527 | 132 | 143 | 57 | 9 | 61 | 91 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 180–396 | 45.5% | 12.4 | 14.6 |
| 2P | 108–216 | 50.0% | 6.8 | 8.0 |
| 3P | 72–180 | 40.0% | 5.6 | 6.6 |
| FT | 95–112 | 84.8% | 3.5 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.5% | 59.2% | 45.5% | 28.3% | 2.34 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Toledo · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $70K
- 80% range $23K to $210K
- Median share of team pool
- 22.4%
- team pool $305K, 80% range $110K to $825K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $64K to $74K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 85.7%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Toledo: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Toledo | $70Kspeculative | $23K to $210K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.9 | +1.6 to +4.1 | Sufficient evidence | +2.8 | +0.1 | +7.6range +6.8 to +8.4 | 3,456 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 35:38 | 33:54 | 25:34–39:00 | |
| Points | 19.4 | 16.5 | 8.0–36.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 68.0% | 54.8% | 16.7%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-14 | Akron | L 76–79 | 38:15 | 21 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8-15 | 3-7 | 2-3 | 63.3% |
| 2026-03-13 | Massachusetts | W 77–67 | 36:52 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-15 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Bowling Green | W 77–76 | 33:48 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8-10 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-06 | Buffalo | W 99–78 | 33:03 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 77.3% |
| 2026-03-03 | Miami (OH) | L 72–74 | 36:14 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-16 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 59.4% |
| 2026-02-28 | Ohio | W 79–67 | 35:57 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9-17 | 0-5 | 4-4 | 52.9% |
| 2026-02-24 | NIU | W 79–69 | 32:13 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-12 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | Eastern Mich. | W 94–75 | 33:09 | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Bowling Green | L 70–80 | 35:56 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-16 | 3-10 | 0-0 | 40.6% |
| 2026-02-11 | Western Mich. | W 90–79 | 27:15 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-9 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 44.4% |
| 2026-02-07 | James Madison | L 71–73 | 36:04 | 24 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-19 | 3-7 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Kent St. | L 72–75 | 37:24 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Ball St. | W 73–55 | 34:30 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4-10 | 2-6 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-27 | Akron | L 81–91 | 39:00 | 20 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8-14 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Bowling Green | W 73–72 | 30:35 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8-17 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 52.9% |
| 2026-01-20 | Massachusetts | L 82–84 | 35:22 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-10 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 80.0% |
| 2026-01-16 | Kent St. | L 84–87 | 31:05 | 19 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6-11 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 72.7% |
| 2026-01-13 | Ohio | W 101–85 | 35:43 | 24 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8-12 | 4-6 | 4-4 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-09 | Miami (OH) | L 73–87 | 34:20 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-14 | 3-9 | 1-1 | 39.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | NIU | W 75–61 | 34:38 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-10 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Central Mich. | W 78–75 | 38:42 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-12 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 20.8% |
| 2025-12-30 | Western Mich. | W 84–79 | 34:13 | 36 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 12-23 | 3-10 | 9-11 | 58.7% |
| 2025-12-16 | Michigan St. | L 69–92 | 30:52 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4-10 | 2-8 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Robert Morris | L 70–75 | 27:12 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2-12 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 16.7% |
| 2025-12-06 | Oakland | L 97–98 | 33:39 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-14 | 2-6 | 4-4 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-26 | Belmont | L 72–87 | 35:39 | 14 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 65.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Troy | W 75–68 | 33:51 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4-11 | 2-5 | 3-5 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-19 | Youngstown St. | W 92–75 | 32:08 | 18 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-8 | 3-3 | 5-6 | 81.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | Detroit Mercy | W 90–83 | 38:31 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-15 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Wright St. | W 81–71 | 33:34 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2-9 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 27.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | Marshall | L 73–85 | 25:34 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 6-6 | 28.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | South Alabama | L 74–76 | 29:45 | 17 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6-12 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 70.8% |