Joah Chappelle
Georgia St. · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
609:45 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 23:27
- Points per game
- 6.8
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.1 / 0.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.8 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 11.7 | 8.7 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 178 | 132 | 14 | 19 | 21 | 20 | 58 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 66–157 | 42.0% | 6.0 | 10.3 |
| 2P | 52–116 | 44.8% | 4.5 | 7.6 |
| 3P | 14–41 | 34.1%† | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| FT | 32–45 | 71.1% | 1.7 | 3.0 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.5% | 50.3% | 26.1% | 28.7% | 0.70 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgia St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $19K
- 80% range $2K to $83K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.2%
- team pool $285K, 80% range $110K to $795K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $17K to $20K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 55.2%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgia St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgia St | $19Kspeculative | $2K to $83K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.1 | -2.4 to +0.3 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | +0.0 | +2.7range +2.3 to +3.2 | 1,992 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 29:51 | 23:27 | 7:54–35:01 | |
| Points | 6.6 | 6.8 | 0.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 39.8% | 48.8% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-03 | Louisiana | L 75–84 | 35:01 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | Old Dominion | L 73–81 | 33:26 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-24 | Coastal Carolina | L 71–76 | 31:46 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2026-02-21 | James Madison | L 65–80 | 27:46 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Ga. Southern | W 66–64 | 21:17 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Old Dominion | L 55–78 | 24:06 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-12 | James Madison | L 79–81 | 16:12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | NIU | L 74–75 | 26:38 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | Troy | L 63–74 | 16:13 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | South Alabama | L 67–69 | 25:24 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Louisiana | L 72–82 | 32:57 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-10 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Arkansas St. | W 82–81 | 20:03 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2026-01-22 | Southern Miss. | W 69–62 | 14:59 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 · NCAA | ULM | W 77–57 | 9:24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Coastal Carolina | W 89–71 | 7:54 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Marshall | L 80–84 | 18:38 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-13 | Jacksonville St. | W 77–73 | 13:14 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Kennesaw St. | L 69–92 | 17:19 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Mercer | L 67–78 | 23:56 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 22.2% |
| 2025-11-26 | New Mexico St. | L 58–77 | 28:47 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-16 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | Samford | L 63–78 | 24:55 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1-9 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-21 | South Dakota St. | L 58–105 | 24:32 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | Arizona St. | L 62–75 | 32:57 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-10 | Presbyterian | L 61–63 | 33:41 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-13 | 2-4 | 5-8 | 69.2% |
| 2025-11-07 | Cincinnati | L 64–74 | 29:32 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | Eastern Mich. | L 49–71 | 19:08 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 60.0% |