Mo Njie
UTSA · 2025–26 · 18 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
143:40 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 18
- Minutes per game
- 7:59
- Points per game
- 1.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.6 / 0.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 6.4 | 8.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 5.8 |
| Season totals | 23 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 21 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 7–17 | 41.2%† | 0.9 | 4.7 |
| 2P | 5–15 | 33.3%† | 0.8 | 4.2 |
| 3P | 2–2 | 100.0%† | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| FT | 7–15 | 46.7%† | 0.8 | 4.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47.1%† | 48.7%† | 11.8%† | 88.2%† | 0.11 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UT San Antonio · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $15K
- 80% range $3K to $48K
- Median share of team pool
- 2.9%
- team pool $765K, 80% range $320K to $1.70M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $12K to $17K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 13.3%
- Limited evidence
- Limited evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UT San Antonio: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UT San Antonio | $15Kspeculative | $3K to $48K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.1 | -3.1 to -1.3 | Limited evidence | -2.1 | +0.0 | +0.3range +0.3 to +0.4 | 499 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2025 | UT San Antonio | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -0.4 | -1.2 to +0.3 | Limited evidence | -0.8 | +0.4 | +0.4range +0.4 to +0.5 | 367 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2023 | SMU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.9 | -4.0 to -2.0 | Limited evidence | -1.8 | -1.1 | +0.2range +0.1 to +0.3 | 398 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail | |
| 2022 | E Michigan | None: no budget that season | — | development: in model selection | -0.5 | -2.0 to +0.7 | Sufficient evidence | -2.1 | +1.6 | Not computed for this season | 1,155 |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 11:26 | 7:59 | 2:00–19:59 | |
| Points | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.0–6.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 40.0% | 44.4% | 0.0%–150.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-07 | North Texas | L 58–81 | 10:12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-3 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-04 | South Fla. | L 88–109 | 8:17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-28 | UAB | L 73–83 | 12:21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Temple | L 64–70 | 19:59 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-21 | North Texas | L 62–81 | 6:20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | Memphis | L 69–95 | 8:10 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Tulane | L 52–85 | 12:36 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-07 | Charlotte | L 58–74 | 11:27 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Temple | L 57–76 | 4:17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-31 | Fla. Atlantic | L 70–110 | 12:24 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Seattle U | L 68–71 | 5:03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Southern California | L 70–97 | 9:59 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 150.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Colorado | L 64–88 | 3:40 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Alabama | L 55–97 | 5:20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | South Alabama | L 58–82 | 5:38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-25 | Ga. Southern | W 77–64 | 3:40 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | — |
| 2025-11-15 | Denver | W 84–79 | 2:17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-07 | SIUE | L 60–77 | 2:00 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |