Jamir Simpson
UTSA · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
987:15 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 35:16
- Points per game
- 16.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.9 / 2.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.1 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.3 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| Season totals | 451 | 110 | 65 | 28 | 3 | 53 | 33 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 156–398 | 39.2% | 14.2 | 16.1 |
| 2P | 108–236 | 45.8% | 8.4 | 9.6 |
| 3P | 48–162 | 29.6% | 5.8 | 6.6 |
| FT | 91–121 | 75.2% | 4.3 | 4.9 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.2% | 50.0% | 40.7% | 30.4% | 1.23 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UT San Antonio · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $35K
- 80% range $3K to $165K
- Median share of team pool
- 7.5%
- team pool $765K, 80% range $320K to $1.70M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $28K to $42K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 88.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UT San Antonio: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UT San Antonio | $35Kspeculative | $3K to $165K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -4.0 | -4.9 to -2.8 | Sufficient evidence | -1.2 | -2.8 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.6 | 3,314 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Southern Utah | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -3.1 | -4.5 to -1.9 | Sufficient evidence | -1.6 | -1.5 | +1.8range +1.2 to +2.4 | 3,139 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 38:28 | 35:16 | 26:52–39:59 | |
| Points | 16.6 | 16.1 | 4.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.9% | 45.2% | 19.4%–77.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Rice | L 71–80 | 37:57 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-15 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-01 | Wichita St. | L 67–84 | 39:59 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7-20 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 42.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | East Carolina | L 81–82 | 39:57 | 22 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8-11 | 1-3 | 5-5 | 77.3% |
| 2026-02-22 | Tulsa | L 74–100 | 35:34 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-17 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 47.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Fla. Atlantic | L 52–60 | 38:55 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-18 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 19.4% |
| 2026-02-15 | Charlotte | W 88–79 | 38:48 | 20 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-14 | 0-2 | 8-9 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-11 | East Carolina | L 72–88 | 37:41 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-16 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 28.1% |
| 2026-02-07 | North Texas | L 58–81 | 34:45 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-16 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 46.9% |
| 2026-02-04 | South Fla. | L 88–109 | 36:20 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8-15 | 3-6 | 5-7 | 63.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | UAB | L 73–83 | 37:29 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8-14 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Temple | L 64–70 | 33:55 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7-17 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 41.2% |
| 2026-01-21 | North Texas | L 62–81 | 32:56 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-18 | Memphis | L 69–95 | 35:58 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2026-01-14 | Rice | L 73–89 | 30:57 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-10 | Tulane | L 52–85 | 33:34 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4-11 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Charlotte | L 58–74 | 36:46 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3-11 | 1-8 | 4-6 | 31.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Temple | L 57–76 | 33:31 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 3-4 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-31 | Fla. Atlantic | L 70–110 | 29:18 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-12 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-22 | Seattle U | L 68–71 | 36:18 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-5 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Southern California | L 70–97 | 32:07 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-14 | 1-5 | 5-7 | 39.3% |
| 2025-12-13 | Colorado | L 64–88 | 33:43 | 20 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8-16 | 2-3 | 2-7 | 56.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | Alabama | L 55–97 | 26:52 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-17 | 2-8 | 4-5 | 47.1% |
| 2025-11-30 | South Alabama | L 58–82 | 31:22 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-16 | 5-12 | 0-0 | 53.1% |
| 2025-11-25 | Ga. Southern | W 77–64 | 36:08 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5-14 | 2-6 | 10-13 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-24 | Abilene Christian | L 50–61 | 36:00 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-13 | 2-6 | 6-9 | 46.2% |
| 2025-11-15 | Denver | W 84–79 | 38:33 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7-13 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 69.2% |
| 2025-11-12 | Texas St. | L 69–80 | 35:25 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-14 | 4-8 | 6-7 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-07 | SIUE | L 60–77 | 36:27 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-15 | 3-9 | 1-2 | 50.0% |