Baboucarr Njie
UTSA · 2025–26 · 27 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
701:07 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 27
- Minutes per game
- 25:58
- Points per game
- 9.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 5.4 / 1.3
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 9.6 | 5.4 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.7 | 8.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 4.9 |
| Season totals | 258 | 145 | 36 | 18 | 43 | 67 | 86 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 96–214 | 44.9% | 7.9 | 12.2 |
| 2P | 94–183 | 51.4% | 6.8 | 10.4 |
| 3P | 2–31 | 6.5%† | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| FT | 64–99 | 64.6% | 3.7 | 5.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.3% | 50.1% | 14.5% | 46.3% | 0.54 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UT San Antonio · Mid and high major · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $105K
- 80% range $6K to $415K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.5%
- team pool $765K, 80% range $320K to $1.70M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $79K to $120K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $5K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 62.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UT San Antonio: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UT San Antonio | $105Kspeculative | $6K to $415K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -1.1 | -2.6 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.6 | -0.5 | +1.4range +1.2 to +1.6 | 2,327 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | UT San Antonio | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.0 | -0.9 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | -0.0 | +1.3range +1.1 to +1.5 | 981 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:05 | 25:58 | 12:59–37:24 | |
| Points | 14.4 | 9.6 | 0.0–25.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 53.2% | 40.2% | 0.0%–69.2% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-08 | Rice | L 71–80 | 30:21 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 6-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-01 | Wichita St. | L 67–84 | 28:06 | 21 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-15 | 0-0 | 5-9 | 53.3% |
| 2026-02-25 | East Carolina | L 81–82 | 20:48 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-22 | Tulsa | L 74–100 | 30:36 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | Fla. Atlantic | L 52–60 | 30:35 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9-13 | 0-2 | 3-6 | 69.2% |
| 2026-02-15 | Charlotte | W 88–79 | 37:24 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 0-2 | 6-7 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | East Carolina | L 72–88 | 17:42 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 28.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | North Texas | L 58–81 | 28:09 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-04 | South Fla. | L 88–109 | 15:55 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | UAB | L 73–83 | 27:07 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5-14 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 35.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Temple | L 64–70 | 32:11 | 25 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 10-18 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-21 | North Texas | L 62–81 | 28:18 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 3-7 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-18 | Memphis | L 69–95 | 34:02 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2-9 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 22.2% |
| 2026-01-14 | Rice | L 73–89 | 36:01 | 23 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9-14 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 67.9% |
| 2026-01-07 | Charlotte | L 58–74 | 21:29 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-03 | Temple | L 57–76 | 32:51 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 5-6 | 30.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | Fla. Atlantic | L 70–110 | 25:17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Seattle U | L 68–71 | 12:59 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 2-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-17 | Southern California | L 70–97 | 13:12 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Colorado | L 64–88 | 16:40 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-07 | Alabama | L 55–97 | 25:52 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-30 | South Alabama | L 58–82 | 14:21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-11-25 | Ga. Southern | W 77–64 | 25:53 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1-6 | 0-1 | 5-8 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-24 | Abilene Christian | L 50–61 | 27:04 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 1-5 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Denver | W 84–79 | 30:37 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9-17 | 0-1 | 5-7 | 52.9% |
| 2025-11-12 | Texas St. | L 69–80 | 33:32 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | SIUE | L 60–77 | 24:05 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 33.3% |