DJ Richards
McNeese · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season
Logged performance
700:37 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 21:54
- Points per game
- 8.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.0 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.7 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 4.3 |
| Season totals | 257 | 64 | 21 | 28 | 5 | 26 | 75 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 71–202 | 35.1% | 6.3 | 11.5 |
| 2P | 16–42 | 38.1%† | 1.3 | 2.4 |
| 3P | 55–160 | 34.4% | 5.0 | 9.1 |
| FT | 60–76 | 78.9% | 2.4 | 4.3 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.8% | 54.6% | 79.2% | 37.6% | 0.81 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
McNeese St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $15K
- 80% range $4K to $48K
- Median share of team pool
- 8.0%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $83K to $610K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $14K to $18K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 51.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
McNeese St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | McNeese St | $15Kspeculative | $4K to $48K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.4 | +0.1 to +2.8 | Sufficient evidence | +1.5 | -0.1 | +3.2range +2.7 to +3.7 | 1,566 | Prior built from the box-score line only, without a prior-season value. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 21:12 | 21:54 | 12:00–33:55 | |
| Points | 6.6 | 8.0 | 0.0–20.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 36.1% | 46.3% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Vanderbilt | L 68–78 | 15:52 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-11 | SFA | W 76–59 | 12:00 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-10 | UTRGV | W 84–80 | 29:15 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5-12 | 2-9 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-02 | Nicholls | W 75–65 | 21:47 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | LSU New Orleans | W 66–63 | 27:06 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2026-02-23 | UTRGV | W 75–68 | 32:49 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 70–54 | 24:02 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-16 | Northwestern St. | W 75–64 | 19:42 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-8 | 1-6 | 3-3 | 18.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | East Texas A&M | W 97–54 | 22:43 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-09 | Houston Christian | W 73–69 | 17:28 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | UIW | W 81–64 | 19:49 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 78.6% |
| 2026-02-02 | SFA | L 60–67 | 26:01 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-7 | 2-7 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | Lamar University | W 64–63 | 20:05 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-27 | Southeastern La. | W 76–66 | 22:34 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-24 | LSU New Orleans | W 82–63 | 21:59 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-19 | A&M-Corpus Christi | W 69–53 | 17:57 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | UTRGV | L 76–79 | 14:56 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 3-3 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-12 | Nicholls | W 94–68 | 23:02 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5-7 | 4-6 | 6-8 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Southeastern La. | W 73–61 | 27:58 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-05 | SFA | W 66–64 | 16:09 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-02 | Lamar University | W 82–70 | 20:40 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Michigan | L 71–112 | 22:42 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4-12 | 3-9 | 0-0 | 45.8% |
| 2025-12-15 | Houston Christian | W 78–68 | 20:22 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4-10 | 3-9 | 3-4 | 55.0% |
| 2025-12-12 | East Texas A&M | W 102–66 | 20:21 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 5-7 | 91.7% |
| 2025-12-09 | Rhode Island | W 66–64 | 15:34 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-05 | Northwestern St. | W 92–54 | 21:27 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-01 | UIW | L 67–71 | 33:55 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-7 | 1-4 | 5-5 | 35.7% |
| 2025-11-25 | Middle Tenn. | W 72–62 | 15:45 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Murray St. | W 73–60 | 24:43 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-23 | George Washington | W 92–86 | 21:41 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-7 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-14 | Louisiana | W 88–62 | 20:09 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | Santa Clara | L 67–79 | 30:04 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 3-4 | 66.7% |