Cal Furnish
Oral Roberts · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
609:05 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 20:18
- Points per game
- 3.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 1.5
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 3.7 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 7.2 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 3.4 |
| Season totals | 110 | 72 | 46 | 19 | 1 | 29 | 52 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 38–86 | 44.2%† | 2.9 | 5.6 |
| 2P | 21–34 | 61.8%† | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| 3P | 17–52 | 32.7% | 1.7 | 3.4 |
| FT | 17–25 | 68.0% | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.1%† | 56.7%† | 60.5%† | 29.1%† | 1.59 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25); the field-goal floor applies to the derived rates above. Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Oral Roberts · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $27K
- 80% range $6K to $100K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.2%
- team pool $205K, 80% range $74K to $550K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $24K to $35K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 48.5%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Oral Roberts: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Oral Roberts | $27Kspeculative | $6K to $100K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.9 to +1.5 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +0.6 | +2.4range +2.1 to +2.7 | 1,827 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 20:50 | 20:18 | 6:17–36:05 | |
| Points | 5.2 | 3.7 | 0.0–12.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 43.2% | 46.5% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | North Dakota St. | L 65–76 | 17:02 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | Kansas City | W 84–62 | 20:27 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Kansas City | W 94–70 | 19:05 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Denver | W 102–80 | 30:32 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-5 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | South Dakota | W 67–62 | 17:05 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-18 | Omaha | L 71–80 | 15:05 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | South Dakota St. | L 69–87 | 6:17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Kansas City | W 69–60 | 18:49 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 75–92 | 13:15 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | South Dakota St. | L 72–95 | 16:23 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | South Dakota | L 69–77 | 15:33 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | North Dakota St. | L 58–86 | 28:25 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 58.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | North Dakota | L 62–79 | 17:26 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Omaha | L 62–73 | 15:12 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Denver | L 87–98 | 18:02 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | — |
| 2026-01-10 | St. Thomas (MN) | L 71–82 | 32:53 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | North Dakota St. | L 77–79 | 36:05 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | North Dakota | L 61–72 | 23:28 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | UT Arlington | L 57–69 | 25:24 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-18 | TCU | L 53–72 | 21:43 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Missouri St. | L 62–63 | 25:53 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Montana St. | W 72–68 | 28:48 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-03 | Weber St. | L 66–92 | 19:44 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 90.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | Rice | L 62–81 | 20:00 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Kennesaw St. | W 91–83 | 8:07 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | — |
| 2025-11-24 | FGCU | L 88–93 | 19:09 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Oklahoma | L 71–95 | 24:08 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Belmont | L 60–83 | 21:49 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-12 | Tulsa | L 87–88 | 26:38 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | Oklahoma St. | L 71–95 | 6:38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |