Kanon Catchings
Georgia · 2025–26 · 32 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
745:52 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 32
- Minutes per game
- 23:19
- Points per game
- 11.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.8 / 1.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 11.6 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.9 | 8.2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| Season totals | 371 | 152 | 37 | 25 | 12 | 39 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 131–310 | 42.3% | 9.7 | 16.6 |
| 2P | 63–129 | 48.8% | 4.0 | 6.9 |
| 3P | 68–181 | 37.6% | 5.7 | 9.7 |
| FT | 41–63 | 65.1% | 2.0 | 3.4 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53.2% | 54.9% | 58.4% | 20.3% | 0.95 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Georgia · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $440K
- 80% range $265K to $720K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.2%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.60M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $440K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $27K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 57.8%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Georgia: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Georgia | $440Kspeculative | $265K to $720K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.4 | +1.7 to +4.8 | Sufficient evidence | +2.7 | +0.7 | +4.8range +4.1 to +5.5 | 2,665 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | BYU | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +3.7 | +2.1 to +5.2 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | +2.9 | +2.5range +2.1 to +2.9 | 1,443 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 22:30 | 23:19 | 11:55–34:05 | |
| Points | 15.4 | 11.6 | 0.0–32.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 52.6% | 50.7% | 0.0%–81.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-19 | Saint Louis | L 77–102 | 17:56 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0-11 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Ole Miss | L 72–76 | 30:55 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7-16 | 4-10 | 1-2 | 56.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Mississippi St. | W 102–96 | 23:25 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7-12 | 5-7 | 4-4 | 79.2% |
| 2026-03-03 | Alabama | W 98–88 | 28:17 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12-20 | 7-13 | 1-2 | 77.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | South Carolina | W 87–68 | 11:55 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-25 | Vanderbilt | L 80–88 | 32:08 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-6 | 1-2 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Texas | W 91–80 | 26:02 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 81.3% |
| 2026-02-17 | Kentucky | W 86–78 | 23:51 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 27.3% |
| 2026-02-14 | Oklahoma | L 78–94 | 13:10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | Florida | L 66–86 | 29:40 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-11 | 3-6 | 2-2 | 40.9% |
| 2026-02-07 | LSU | W 83–71 | 28:28 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-13 | 5-6 | 2-4 | 80.8% |
| 2026-01-31 | Texas A&M | L 77–92 | 29:05 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-14 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Tennessee | L 85–86 | 31:58 | 22 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8-14 | 4-8 | 2-5 | 71.4% |
| 2026-01-24 | Texas | L 67–87 | 17:33 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-20 | Missouri | W 74–72 | 24:32 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-13 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 42.3% |
| 2026-01-17 | Arkansas | W 90–76 | 23:14 | 15 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5-12 | 3-8 | 2-2 | 54.2% |
| 2026-01-14 | Ole Miss | L 95–97 | 34:05 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 4-5 | 3-4 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | South Carolina | W 75–70 | 29:45 | 20 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6-13 | 4-9 | 4-7 | 61.5% |
| 2026-01-06 | Florida | L 77–92 | 27:03 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Auburn | W 104–100 | 25:39 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-5 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | LIU | W 89–74 | 14:44 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2-6 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 41.7% |
| 2025-12-18 | Western Caro. | W 112–82 | 21:35 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Cincinnati | W 84–65 | 25:57 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-02 | Florida St. | W 107–73 | 23:52 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-12 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-29 | Tennessee Tech | W 123–81 | 25:04 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6-12 | 3-9 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2025-11-23 | Clemson | L 94–97 | 19:02 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 31.3% |
| 2025-11-21 | Xavier | W 78–77 | 16:44 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1-9 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-17 | Florida A&M | W 87–57 | 16:34 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Georgia Tech | W 92–87 | 17:43 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-10 | 0-6 | 2-2 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-09 | Morehead St. | W 120–81 | 16:45 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-10 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-05 | UMES | W 94–29 | 18:55 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6-11 | 0-5 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Bellarmine | W 104–59 | 20:16 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 75.0% |