Trent Middleton Jr.
N.C. A&T · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
831:59 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 29:43
- Points per game
- 12.4
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.5 / 3.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 12.4 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Per 40 minutes | 16.6 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| Season totals | 346 | 98 | 84 | 25 | 3 | 66 | 57 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 121–268 | 45.1% | 9.6 | 12.9 |
| 2P | 90–169 | 53.3% | 6.0 | 8.1 |
| 3P | 31–99 | 31.3% | 3.5 | 4.8 |
| FT | 73–96 | 76.0% | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.9% | 55.8% | 36.9% | 35.8% | 1.27 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
NC A&T · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $28K
- 80% range $4K to $89K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.8%
- team pool $205K, 80% range $77K to $555K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $27K to $28K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 73.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
NC A&T: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | NC A&T | $28Kspeculative | $4K to $89K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.1 | -1.0 to +1.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.7 | +3.9range +3.4 to +4.3 | 2,756 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Delaware | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.0 | -0.3 to +2.0 | Sufficient evidence | +0.4 | +0.6 | +2.4range +2.0 to +2.8 | 1,576 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:13 | 29:43 | 6:43–40:59 | |
| Points | 15.0 | 12.4 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 54.6% | 47.5% | 0.0%–85.7% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Northeastern | L 72–88 | 32:45 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5-16 | 1-5 | 4-4 | 34.4% |
| 2026-03-03 | Campbell | L 72–90 | 27:47 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5-9 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 61.1% |
| 2026-02-28 | William & Mary | L 88–91 | 29:11 | 15 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 4-4 | 68.8% |
| 2026-02-26 | UNCW | L 65–88 | 26:40 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-9 | 1-6 | 5-6 | 27.8% |
| 2026-02-21 | Elon | W 102–82 | 39:41 | 24 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 10-13 | 1-4 | 3-5 | 80.8% |
| 2026-02-19 | Col. of Charleston | L 61–74 | 35:51 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-9 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 11.1% |
| 2026-02-13 | Hampton | W 71–70 | 36:48 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-13 | 1-3 | 6-7 | 34.6% |
| 2026-02-07 | Campbell | L 71–79 | 8:34 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Col. of Charleston | L 62–78 | 32:06 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4-8 | 2-4 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Drexel | L 60–61 | 34:51 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-3 | 6-7 | 38.5% |
| 2026-01-29 | Monmouth | L 81–83 | 40:59 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 10-14 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Towson | W 80–73 | 37:47 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 5-6 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-22 | Hofstra | W 79–78 | 35:02 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7-18 | 3-10 | 3-4 | 47.2% |
| 2026-01-19 | Hampton | L 61–82 | 27:33 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-11 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-15 | William & Mary | L 89–97 | 25:17 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-12 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-08 | Elon | L 64–69 | 27:04 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Stony Brook | L 80–81 | 28:29 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-7 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 28.6% |
| 2025-12-31 | Northeastern | L 74–85 | 29:26 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 81.3% |
| 2025-12-29 | UNCW | L 78–87 | 6:43 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | UNC Greensboro | W 71–65 | 38:03 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7-17 | 3-9 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-12 | UMES | W 82–79 | 30:05 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-9 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 44.4% |
| 2025-12-09 | Howard | L 69–73 | 28:13 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | N.C. Central | W 69–54 | 35:14 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 5-5 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-02 | Charlotte | L 57–74 | 29:39 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5-7 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 85.7% |
| 2025-11-28 | Davidson | L 74–90 | 27:59 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4-7 | 1-4 | 3-7 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-18 | Morgan St. | W 79–73 | 36:15 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 56.3% |
| 2025-11-10 | South Carolina St. | W 85–62 | 21:44 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-8 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-04 | South Carolina | L 72–91 | 22:13 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 57.1% |