Travis Harper II
Tennessee St. · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
953:25 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 31:47
- Points per game
- 17.1
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 17.1 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 21.5 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| Season totals | 513 | 109 | 31 | 33 | 12 | 45 | 44 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 166–355 | 46.8% | 11.8 | 14.9 |
| 2P | 89–165 | 53.9% | 5.5 | 6.9 |
| 3P | 77–190 | 40.5% | 6.3 | 8.0 |
| FT | 104–121 | 86.0% | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.6% | 62.8% | 53.5% | 34.1% | 0.69 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tennessee St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $50K
- 80% range $17K to $145K
- Median share of team pool
- 22.6%
- team pool $205K, 80% range $78K to $545K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $47K to $52K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.1%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tennessee St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tennessee St | $50Kspeculative | $17K to $145K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +3.1 | +1.6 to +4.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.9 | +1.2 | +6.6range +5.8 to +7.2 | 3,162 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Tennessee St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +2.1 | +0.7 to +3.7 | Sufficient evidence | +0.3 | +1.8 | +3.2range +2.7 to +3.9 | 1,995 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 34:20 | 31:47 | 21:33–36:21 | |
| Points | 15.6 | 17.1 | 4.0–30.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 59.4% | 57.3% | 20.0%–94.4% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-20 | Iowa St. | L 74–108 | 34:50 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-13 | 0-5 | 5-6 | 30.8% |
| 2026-03-07 | Morehead St. | W 93–67 | 35:32 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6-9 | 5-7 | 0-0 | 94.4% |
| 2026-03-06 | UT Martin | W 68–55 | 34:26 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5-14 | 4-11 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | UT Martin | W 67–42 | 30:30 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7-13 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 61.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Southeast Mo. St. | W 79–71 | 36:21 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-4 | 6-6 | 60.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | SIUE | W 80–53 | 34:11 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-19 | Lindenwood | W 89–80 | 34:39 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5-17 | 1-7 | 6-7 | 32.4% |
| 2026-02-14 | Morehead St. | L 86–94 | 34:45 | 30 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8-18 | 5-9 | 9-11 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-12 | Southern Ind. | W 73–71 | 34:31 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-12 | 3-5 | 9-10 | 54.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | Western Ill. | W 83–56 | 21:33 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 45.8% |
| 2026-02-05 | Eastern Ill. | W 77–68 | 22:28 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 20.0% |
| 2026-02-02 | Tennessee Tech | L 85–90 | 31:00 | 19 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6-13 | 3-8 | 4-5 | 57.7% |
| 2026-01-29 | Little Rock | W 70–63 | 30:11 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7-11 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 72.7% |
| 2026-01-24 | Lindenwood | W 96–86 | 35:11 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13-21 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-22 | SIUE | L 66–74 | 30:16 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-13 | 2-7 | 9-9 | 30.8% |
| 2026-01-17 | Southern Ind. | W 73–67 | 35:03 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-11 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 40.9% |
| 2026-01-15 | Morehead St. | W 105–100 | 36:10 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5-9 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 77.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | Eastern Ill. | L 70–74 | 33:30 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 1-4 | 7-7 | 61.1% |
| 2026-01-08 | Western Ill. | W 90–68 | 22:35 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7-10 | 3-6 | 6-6 | 85.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Little Rock | W 84–79 | 28:36 | 21 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 3-7 | 4-4 | 60.7% |
| 2025-12-30 | Tennessee Tech | W 88–76 | 31:28 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 9-15 | 9-14 | 2-2 | 90.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 82–91 | 28:50 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 5-9 | 4-5 | 73.1% |
| 2025-12-18 | UT Martin | W 78–71 | 33:37 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-10 | 4-6 | 2-2 | 70.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | UNLV | W 63–60 | 33:40 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Alabama A&M | L 53–80 | 28:31 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2-8 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 31.3% |
| 2025-11-30 | Chattanooga | W 70–64 | 33:43 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6-10 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 75.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | UNC Asheville | W 75–73 | 27:46 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-12 | 0-4 | 4-5 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-20 | Tennessee | L 60–89 | 32:40 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7-15 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 56.7% |
| 2025-11-16 | Western Ky. | L 82–95 | 32:33 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6-11 | 3-6 | 3-4 | 68.2% |
| 2025-11-08 | Belmont | L 79–87 | 34:19 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-6 | 5-6 | 55.6% |