Khalil London
Tennessee St. · 2025–26 · 21 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
302:23 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 21
- Minutes per game
- 14:24
- Points per game
- 5.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 1.4 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.6 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.6 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| Season totals | 118 | 30 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 23 | 29 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 41–128 | 32.0% | 6.1 | 16.9 |
| 2P | 27–70 | 38.6%† | 3.3 | 9.3 |
| 3P | 14–58 | 24.1% | 2.8 | 7.7 |
| FT | 22–28 | 78.6% | 1.3 | 3.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.5% | 42.0% | 45.3% | 21.9% | 0.87 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tennessee St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $3K
- 80% range $1K to $12K
- Median share of team pool
- 1.1%
- team pool $205K, 80% range $78K to $545K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $3K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 25.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tennessee St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tennessee St | $3Kspeculative | $1K to $12K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -2.5 | -3.2 to -1.6 | Sufficient evidence | -1.3 | -1.2 | +1.1range +0.9 to +1.3 | 999 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Col Charleston | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.9 | -3.4 to -0.4 | Sufficient evidence | -0.5 | -1.4 | +0.7range +0.5 to +1.1 | 1,132 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 9:25 | 14:24 | 3:06–28:25 | |
| Points | 3.4 | 5.6 | 0.0–23.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 32.7% | 34.1% | 0.0%–93.8% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-12 | Southern Ind. | W 73–71 | 6:14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | Western Ill. | W 83–56 | 15:02 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Eastern Ill. | W 77–68 | 13:31 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 42.9% |
| 2026-02-02 | Tennessee Tech | L 85–90 | 8:35 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-29 | Little Rock | W 70–63 | 3:41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Lindenwood | W 96–86 | 3:06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | SIUE | L 66–74 | 15:14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Southern Ind. | W 73–67 | 12:28 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Morehead St. | W 105–100 | 17:14 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 6-8 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Eastern Ill. | L 70–74 | 25:16 | 23 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8-15 | 3-9 | 4-4 | 63.3% |
| 2026-01-08 | Western Ill. | W 90–68 | 17:50 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 93.8% |
| 2026-01-03 | Little Rock | W 84–79 | 11:21 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-30 | Tennessee Tech | W 88–76 | 13:35 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-20 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 82–91 | 13:21 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 14.3% |
| 2025-12-18 | UT Martin | W 78–71 | 16:28 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | UNLV | W 63–60 | 12:13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-03 | Alabama A&M | L 53–80 | 21:35 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 41.7% |
| 2025-11-30 | Chattanooga | W 70–64 | 10:35 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Tennessee | L 60–89 | 15:26 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-7 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-16 | Western Ky. | L 82–95 | 21:13 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-6 | 0-4 | 1-2 | 16.7% |
| 2025-11-08 | Belmont | L 79–87 | 28:25 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4-16 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 31.3% |