Troy Plumtree
Cal Poly · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
351:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 12:33
- Points per game
- 5.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.4 / 0.7
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 5.0 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.8 | 7.6 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 4.9 |
| Season totals | 139 | 67 | 20 | 12 | 5 | 31 | 43 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 59–109 | 54.1% | 3.9 | 12.4 |
| 2P | 52–79 | 65.8%† | 2.8 | 9.0 |
| 3P | 7–30 | 23.3%† | 1.1 | 3.4 |
| FT | 14–19 | 73.7%† | 0.7 | 2.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57.3% | 59.2% | 27.5% | 17.4% | 0.65 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Cal Poly · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $9K
- 80% range $2K to $33K
- Median share of team pool
- 4.1%
- team pool $300K, 80% range $110K to $790K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $8K to $10K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 27.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Cal Poly: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Cal Poly | $9Kspeculative | $2K to $33K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.5 | -1.4 to +0.5 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -1.3 | +1.7range +1.5 to +2.0 | 1,195 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 13:36 | 12:33 | 1:37–25:00 | |
| Points | 6.0 | 5.0 | 0.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 55.6% | 53.9% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | UC San Diego | L 69–72 | 10:20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | CSU Bakersfield | W 108–76 | 17:30 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 44.4% |
| 2026-03-05 | UC Irvine | L 85–107 | 12:22 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-9 | 0-3 | 1-1 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | UC San Diego | L 64–80 | 10:17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | Long Beach St. | W 102–92 | 17:29 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-20 | Hawaii | W 86–75 | 16:23 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 80.0% |
| 2026-02-14 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | W 89–79 | 13:00 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | UC Irvine | W 79–73 | 18:26 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | UC Davis | L 58–67 | 4:34 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-02-05 | CSUN | L 96–97 | 2:56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-31 | UC Riverside | W 94–87 | 11:51 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | CSU Bakersfield | W 104–79 | 24:27 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 13-17 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 85.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 78–93 | 11:50 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 67–107 | 9:48 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Hawaii | L 66–86 | 1:37 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2026-01-03 | Long Beach St. | L 66–74 | 5:43 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | — |
| 2025-12-21 | Idaho | L 80–83 | 8:36 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-19 | UCLA | L 87–108 | 9:25 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Montana St. | L 80–83 | 15:13 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-06 | UC Riverside | L 84–88 | 25:00 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-6 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-04 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 94–91 | 8:52 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 68–84 | 14:46 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Northern Ariz. | L 87–93 | 8:52 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-20 | Utah | W 92–85 | 12:02 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | Montana | L 82–90 | 20:45 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-12 | Colorado St. | L 79–93 | 9:02 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 60.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Seattle U | W 73–71 | 12:03 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Southern California | L 64–94 | 18:23 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 62.5% |