Hamad Mousa
Cal Poly · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
947:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 31:35
- Points per game
- 20.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.2 / 1.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 20.3 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 25.8 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 2.4 |
| Season totals | 610 | 186 | 58 | 29 | 11 | 80 | 58 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 181–414 | 43.7% | 13.8 | 17.5 |
| 2P | 105–205 | 51.2% | 6.8 | 8.7 |
| 3P | 76–209 | 36.4% | 7.0 | 8.8 |
| FT | 172–195 | 88.2% | 6.5 | 8.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.9% | 61.0% | 50.5% | 47.1% | 0.72 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Cal Poly · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $68K
- 80% range $22K to $200K
- Median share of team pool
- 21.6%
- team pool $300K, 80% range $110K to $790K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $54K to $73K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 75.9%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Cal Poly: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Cal Poly | $68Kspeculative | $22K to $200K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.9 | +0.8 to +3.2 | Sufficient evidence | +1.7 | +0.2 | +5.5range +5.0 to +6.0 | 3,268 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Dayton | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.3 | -1.9 to -0.6 | Limited evidence | -1.4 | +0.0 | +0.3range +0.3 to +0.4 | 322 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 30:39 | 31:35 | 24:08–38:30 | |
| Points | 21.4 | 20.3 | 5.0–34.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 56.2% | 53.6% | 16.7%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | UC San Diego | L 69–72 | 34:35 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8-22 | 0-6 | 5-5 | 36.4% |
| 2026-03-07 | CSU Bakersfield | W 108–76 | 25:05 | 23 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9-15 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 73.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | UC Irvine | L 85–107 | 31:53 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5-14 | 1-4 | 4-5 | 39.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | UC San Diego | L 64–80 | 34:16 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7-14 | 3-9 | 2-2 | 60.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | Long Beach St. | W 102–92 | 27:24 | 29 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8-14 | 4-7 | 9-10 | 71.4% |
| 2026-02-20 | Hawaii | W 86–75 | 35:45 | 24 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-17 | 2-7 | 12-13 | 35.3% |
| 2026-02-14 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | W 89–79 | 32:12 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 4-5 | 65.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | UC Irvine | W 79–73 | 33:16 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 31.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | UC Davis | L 58–67 | 31:12 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2-12 | 0-6 | 8-8 | 16.7% |
| 2026-02-05 | CSUN | L 96–97 | 33:02 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 10-15 | 7-11 | 6-6 | 90.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | UC Riverside | W 94–87 | 34:52 | 26 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10-20 | 0-5 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | CSU Bakersfield | W 104–79 | 27:55 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 3-8 | 6-6 | 45.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Cal St. Fullerton | L 78–93 | 35:41 | 15 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-13 | 1-6 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-22 · NCAA | UC Santa Barbara | L 67–107 | 25:18 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 4-5 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Hawaii | L 66–86 | 33:58 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 6-19 | 2-13 | 3-4 | 36.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | UC Davis | W 84–78 | 35:47 | 24 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-14 | 2-8 | 10-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | CSUN | L 90–95 | 35:21 | 34 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11-25 | 7-16 | 5-6 | 58.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Long Beach St. | L 66–74 | 36:41 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-14 | 4-10 | 5-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | UC San Diego | W 67–65 | 35:47 | 26 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9-17 | 5-10 | 3-5 | 67.6% |
| 2025-12-21 | Idaho | L 80–83 | 38:30 | 33 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 7-15 | 2-8 | 17-19 | 53.3% |
| 2025-12-19 | UCLA | L 87–108 | 31:45 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 4-11 | 2-7 | 4-4 | 45.5% |
| 2025-12-16 | Montana St. | L 80–83 | 25:14 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 4-10 | 1-5 | 7-9 | 45.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | UC Riverside | L 84–88 | 35:59 | 31 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-14 | 4-9 | 11-11 | 71.4% |
| 2025-12-04 | Cal St. Fullerton | W 94–91 | 26:52 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8-13 | 4-8 | 7-9 | 76.9% |
| 2025-11-25 | Southeast Mo. St. | L 68–84 | 24:08 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1-5 | 1-2 | 11-11 | 30.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Northern Ariz. | L 87–93 | 27:44 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6-15 | 3-10 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-20 | Utah | W 92–85 | 25:49 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-13 | 4-4 | 6-9 | 76.9% |
| 2025-11-12 | Colorado St. | L 79–93 | 27:35 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5-13 | 4-7 | 4-6 | 53.8% |
| 2025-11-08 | Seattle U | W 73–71 | 32:29 | 18 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5-11 | 0-3 | 8-10 | 45.5% |
| 2025-11-03 | Southern California | L 64–94 | 31:27 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 5-18 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 33.3% |