Bahsil Laster
UT Arlington · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
574:26 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 19:09
- Points per game
- 6.9
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.7 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.9 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| Per 40 minutes | 14.5 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 208 | 82 | 29 | 17 | 4 | 47 | 45 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 45–131 | 34.4% | 4.4 | 9.1 |
| 2P | 38–92 | 41.3%† | 3.1 | 6.4 |
| 3P | 7–39 | 17.9%† | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| FT | 111–141 | 78.7% | 4.7 | 9.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.0% | 53.9% | 29.8% | 107.6% | 0.62 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UT Arlington · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $26K
- 80% range $8K to $82K
- Median share of team pool
- 11.4%
- team pool $220K, 80% range $82K to $590K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $25K to $29K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 46.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UT Arlington: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UT Arlington | $26Kspeculative | $8K to $82K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.7 | +0.6 to +2.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.1 | +1.5 | +3.6range +3.1 to +4.0 | 1,772 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 23:23 | 19:09 | 5:47–30:46 | |
| Points | 9.8 | 6.9 | 1.0–18.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 23.3% | 35.6% | 0.0%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | Utah Valley | L 65–67 | 30:46 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Southern Utah | W 69–63 | 24:34 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 6-7 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-07 | Abilene Christian | W 64–57 | 23:03 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 33.3% |
| 2026-03-05 | Tarleton St. | W 65–60 | 23:25 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 11-12 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-26 | California Baptist | L 56–68 | 15:06 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-4 | — |
| 2026-02-21 | Utah Valley | L 54–66 | 23:13 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-19 | Utah Tech | W 63–50 | 23:02 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 2-5 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-14 | Southern Utah | L 73–78 | 13:55 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-12 | Abilene Christian | L 63–67 | 20:21 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Utah Valley | L 60–81 | 15:06 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 3-6 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Utah Tech | L 84–87 | 12:55 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | California Baptist | L 77–87 | 19:38 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-29 | Southern Utah | W 80–61 | 13:25 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-21 | Tarleton St. | W 71–64 | 19:33 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-9 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 38.9% |
| 2026-01-17 | Utah Valley | L 74–86 | 13:59 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 3-3 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Utah Tech | W 56–52 | 22:35 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Abilene Christian | W 82–72 | 29:35 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-4 | 9-10 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-03 | Southern Utah | W 86–77 | 27:29 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-7 | 1-2 | 3-4 | 21.4% |
| 2026-01-01 | California Baptist | W 63–51 | 12:50 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 6-6 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Tarleton St. | L 63–69 | 22:27 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | Oral Roberts | W 69–57 | 23:43 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-17 | Stanford | L 60–76 | 26:55 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 6-8 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-11 | UTRGV | W 58–50 | 19:32 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Arkansas St. | L 63–83 | 17:45 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-3 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-29 | SFA | W 66–61 | 10:49 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-22 | Weber St. | W 74–73 | 5:47 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-21 | Campbell | L 67–71 | 14:49 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-18 | Evansville | W 84–76 | 8:48 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-15 | Missouri St. | W 67–49 | 22:29 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | New Mexico | L 56–74 | 16:52 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-2 | 4-6 | 50.0% |