Jamal West Jr.
UTEP · 2025–26 · 28 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
893:32 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 28
- Minutes per game
- 31:55
- Points per game
- 14.3
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 6.7 / 1.4
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 14.3 | 6.7 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 2.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.0 | 8.4 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 3.7 |
| Season totals | 401 | 187 | 39 | 25 | 40 | 55 | 82 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 140–266 | 52.6% | 9.5 | 11.9 |
| 2P | 132–239 | 55.2% | 8.5 | 10.7 |
| 3P | 8–27 | 29.6%† | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| FT | 113–171 | 66.1% | 6.1 | 7.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.1% | 58.8% | 10.2% | 64.3% | 0.71 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UTEP · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $31K
- 80% range $3K to $98K
- Median share of team pool
- 13.9%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $105K to $715K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $30K to $33K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 79.3%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UTEP: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UTEP | $31Kspeculative | $3K to $98K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.3 | -1.2 to +0.8 | Sufficient evidence | -0.4 | +0.2 | +3.8range +3.3 to +4.2 | 2,757 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Nicholls St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.2 | -1.0 to +1.4 | Sufficient evidence | +0.5 | -0.3 | +3.1range +2.5 to +3.8 | 2,078 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Nicholls St | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.9 | +0.2 to +1.6 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +0.9 | +3.5range +3.0 to +4.0 | 2,242 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 31:21 | 31:55 | 15:43–43:06 | |
| Points | 19.0 | 14.3 | 4.0–28.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 51.3% | 55.1% | 33.3%–100.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Jacksonville St. | L 61–64 | 29:19 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6-12 | 0-1 | 7-10 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-05 | Kennesaw St. | W 78–71 | 36:35 | 28 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7-15 | 0-1 | 14-16 | 46.7% |
| 2026-02-28 | Western Ky. | L 65–97 | 37:06 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7-11 | 2-3 | 6-13 | 72.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–77 | 15:43 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-21 | New Mexico St. | L 63–67 | 38:03 | 22 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7-13 | 0-1 | 8-10 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Liberty | L 64–73 | 23:31 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | Jacksonville St. | W 69–64 | 32:50 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | New Mexico St. | W 91–88 | 37:59 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4-11 | 0-1 | 12-20 | 36.4% |
| 2026-02-04 | Sam Houston | L 66–70 | 34:29 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8-15 | 0-2 | 5-8 | 53.3% |
| 2026-01-31 | Delaware | W 70–55 | 29:05 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5-9 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-28 | Louisiana Tech | L 59–69 | 37:46 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | Missouri St. | L 57–62 | 36:09 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6-15 | 1-4 | 2-5 | 43.3% |
| 2026-01-22 | FIU | W 83–77 | 33:32 | 28 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 11-14 | 2-3 | 4-6 | 85.7% |
| 2026-01-17 | Liberty | L 69–80 | 29:27 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-15 | Delaware | W 70–69 | 35:47 | 16 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7-9 | 1-1 | 1-3 | 83.3% |
| 2026-01-10 | Western Ky. | L 56–68 | 35:41 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-11 | 0-0 | 5-8 | 45.5% |
| 2026-01-08 | Middle Tenn. | W 83–80 | 43:06 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6-15 | 0-1 | 4-7 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | FIU | L 64–76 | 30:18 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 2-3 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-02 | Missouri St. | L 55–79 | 29:13 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-7 | 66.7% |
| 2025-12-29 | Louisiana Tech | L 63–75 | 32:16 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | North Dakota St. | W 76–66 | 26:03 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5-10 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Norfolk St. | L 71–72 | 34:54 | 16 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 2-7 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-14 | Hawaii | L 61–66 | 33:41 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 54.5% |
| 2025-12-07 | Seattle U | L 68–75 | 35:51 | 21 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8-11 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 72.7% |
| 2025-11-25 | UAB | L 59–75 | 23:11 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-24 | William & Mary | L 63–74 | 24:34 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | Utah St. | L 51–75 | 23:26 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | LMU (CA) | L 58–71 | 33:57 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 45.8% |