Caleb Blackwell
UTEP · 2025–26 · 25 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
771:00 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 25
- Minutes per game
- 30:50
- Points per game
- 10.7
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 2.8 / 2.9
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 10.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| Per 40 minutes | 13.9 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 3.1 |
| Season totals | 268 | 69 | 73 | 32 | 2 | 41 | 60 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 100–238 | 42.0% | 9.5 | 12.3 |
| 2P | 53–115 | 46.1% | 4.6 | 6.0 |
| 3P | 47–123 | 38.2% | 4.9 | 6.4 |
| FT | 21–34 | 61.8% | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.9% | 53.0% | 51.7% | 14.3% | 1.78 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
UTEP · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $35K
- 80% range $6K to $115K
- Median share of team pool
- 14.0%
- team pool $275K, 80% range $105K to $715K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $34K to $37K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 69.0%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
UTEP: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UTEP | $35Kspeculative | $6K to $115K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +0.3 | -0.8 to +1.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.0 | +0.3 | +3.5range +3.1 to +3.9 | 2,398 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Alabama A&M | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.0 | -2.1 to +0.6 | Sufficient evidence | -0.0 | -1.0 | +1.4range +1.1 to +1.8 | 1,773 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:11 | 30:50 | 17:08–41:41 | |
| Points | 11.8 | 10.7 | 0.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 57.8% | 48.4% | 0.0%–87.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Jacksonville St. | L 61–64 | 32:30 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 71.4% |
| 2026-03-05 | Kennesaw St. | W 78–71 | 38:24 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5-14 | 1-6 | 0-2 | 39.3% |
| 2026-02-28 | Western Ky. | L 65–97 | 29:58 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 66.7% |
| 2026-02-26 | Middle Tenn. | L 67–77 | 28:56 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | New Mexico St. | L 63–67 | 36:09 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7-11 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 81.8% |
| 2026-02-14 | Liberty | L 64–73 | 37:09 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4-9 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 55.6% |
| 2026-02-11 | Jacksonville St. | W 69–64 | 34:07 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6-12 | 2-7 | 2-3 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | New Mexico St. | W 91–88 | 41:41 | 21 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6-12 | 2-6 | 7-8 | 58.3% |
| 2026-02-04 | Sam Houston | L 66–70 | 35:08 | 22 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8-17 | 3-8 | 3-4 | 55.9% |
| 2026-01-31 | Delaware | W 70–55 | 33:07 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 37.5% |
| 2026-01-28 | Louisiana Tech | L 59–69 | 33:18 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 20.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Missouri St. | L 57–62 | 17:08 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | FIU | W 83–77 | 33:32 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Liberty | L 69–80 | 33:00 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-13 | 6-11 | 0-0 | 76.9% |
| 2026-01-15 | Delaware | W 70–69 | 35:24 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5-11 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 63.6% |
| 2026-01-10 | Western Ky. | L 56–68 | 18:53 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Louisiana Tech | L 63–75 | 30:45 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-10 | 2-7 | 0-0 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-22 | North Dakota St. | W 76–66 | 26:47 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-8 | 4-5 | 1-2 | 87.5% |
| 2025-12-21 | Norfolk St. | L 71–72 | 32:12 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7-13 | 3-6 | 1-6 | 65.4% |
| 2025-12-14 | Hawaii | L 61–66 | 28:37 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-12-07 | Seattle U | L 68–75 | 24:37 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 25.0% |
| 2025-11-25 | UAB | L 59–75 | 22:59 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | William & Mary | L 63–74 | 29:04 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6-15 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 43.3% |
| 2025-11-15 | Utah St. | L 51–75 | 34:18 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3-10 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 35.0% |
| 2025-11-11 | LMU (CA) | L 58–71 | 23:17 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-10 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 45.0% |