Bishop Boswell
Tennessee · 2025–26 · 34 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
900:28 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 34
- Minutes per game
- 26:29
- Points per game
- 6.2
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.4 / 3.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.2 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.4 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 4.1 |
| Season totals | 212 | 149 | 106 | 41 | 4 | 53 | 92 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 67–157 | 42.7% | 4.6 | 7.0 |
| 2P | 37–79 | 46.8%† | 2.3 | 3.5 |
| 3P | 30–78 | 38.5% | 2.3 | 3.5 |
| FT | 48–72 | 66.7% | 2.1 | 3.2 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.2% | 56.2% | 49.7% | 45.9% | 2.00 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Tennessee · Power 4 · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $310K
- 80% range $125K to $505K
- Median share of team pool
- 9.2%
- team pool $3.60M, 80% range $2.55M to $4.95M
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $310K in all four
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $22K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 59.9%
- Sufficient evidence
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. House-settlement $20.5M cap (College Sports Commission, 2026-10-01) times a modelled utilisation of about 97 percent times a men's basketball share of about 18 percent (school statements and an industry study); Power 4 schools are at or near the cap nationally.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Tennessee: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tennessee | $310Kspeculative | $125K to $505K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +2.4 | +0.9 to +3.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.9 | +1.5 | +5.2range +4.4 to +5.9 | 3,020 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Tennessee | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -1.2 | -2.3 to -0.5 | Limited evidence | -1.9 | +0.6 | +0.3range +0.2 to +0.3 | 316 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:28 | 26:29 | 17:27–42:34 | |
| Points | 5.0 | 6.2 | 0.0–13.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 38.0% | 57.8% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-29 | Michigan | L 62–95 | 24:41 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 30.0% |
| 2026-03-27 | Iowa St. | W 76–62 | 28:24 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-22 | Virginia | W 79–72 | 35:41 | 13 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4-10 | 4-9 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-03-20 | Miami (OH) | W 78–56 | 22:35 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-13 | Vanderbilt | L 68–75 | 20:59 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-12 | Auburn | W 72–62 | 30:40 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-5 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | Vanderbilt | L 82–86 | 29:05 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2-7 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 35.7% |
| 2026-03-03 | South Carolina | W 78–59 | 28:54 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-8 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-28 | Alabama | L 69–71 | 27:43 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2-6 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2026-02-24 | Missouri | L 69–73 | 32:56 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-11 | 2-6 | 1-1 | 54.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Vanderbilt | W 69–65 | 23:25 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 57.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Oklahoma | W 89–66 | 25:06 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | LSU | W 73–63 | 22:57 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Mississippi St. | W 73–64 | 28:44 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kentucky | L 71–74 | 31:37 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 6-6 | 40.0% |
| 2026-02-03 | Ole Miss | W 84–66 | 32:25 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 | 5-8 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Auburn | W 77–69 | 30:02 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 70.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | Georgia | W 86–85 | 42:27 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-24 | Alabama | W 79–73 | 23:53 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Kentucky | L 78–80 | 26:02 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 1-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-13 | Texas A&M | W 87–82 | 42:34 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 8-12 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | Florida | L 67–91 | 20:52 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-06 | Texas | W 85–71 | 23:27 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Arkansas | L 75–86 | 20:53 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-12-30 | South Carolina St. | W 105–54 | 18:41 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2025-12-21 | Gardner-Webb | W 94–52 | 18:41 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 2-2 | 125.0% |
| 2025-12-16 | Louisville | W 83–62 | 21:58 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Illinois | L 62–75 | 26:37 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2-5 | 2-5 | 1-2 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-02 | Syracuse | L 60–62 | 20:39 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-26 | Kansas | L 76–81 | 27:12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Houston | W 76–73 | 32:07 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-4 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | Rutgers | W 85–60 | 18:54 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-08 | Northern Ky. | W 95–56 | 22:10 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 100.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Mercer | W 76–61 | 17:27 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 75.0% |