Emondrek Erkins-Ford
Jacksonville St. · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
638:45 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 22:02
- Points per game
- 8.6
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.6 / 1.0
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 8.6 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
| Per 40 minutes | 15.7 | 6.6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 4.2 |
| Season totals | 250 | 105 | 28 | 13 | 27 | 25 | 67 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 92–176 | 52.3% | 6.1 | 11.0 |
| 2P | 84–152 | 55.3% | 5.2 | 9.5 |
| 3P | 8–24 | 33.3%† | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| FT | 58–89 | 65.2% | 3.1 | 5.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.5% | 58.1% | 13.6% | 50.6% | 1.12 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Jacksonville St · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $34K
- 80% range $8K to $115K
- Median share of team pool
- 12.2%
- team pool $270K, 80% range $95K to $730K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $30K to $36K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 54.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Jacksonville St: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jacksonville St | $34Kspeculative | $8K to $115K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.1 | -0.4 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +1.1 | +0.1 | +4.0range +3.4 to +4.4 | 2,093 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 26:24 | 22:02 | 8:51–34:13 | |
| Points | 8.2 | 8.6 | 0.0–24.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 50.8% | 55.2% | 0.0%–125.0% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-10 | New Mexico St. | L 63–68 | 26:04 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-03-07 | UTEP | W 64–61 | 32:03 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 37.5% |
| 2026-03-05 | New Mexico St. | L 75–77 | 34:13 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7-13 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 53.8% |
| 2026-02-28 | Liberty | L 78–81 | 30:48 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-26 | Delaware | W 80–70 | 8:51 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Sam Houston | L 78–82 | 22:41 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-10 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 35.0% |
| 2026-02-18 | Louisiana Tech | L 71–77 | 27:50 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | New Mexico St. | L 70–79 | 18:19 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | UTEP | L 64–69 | 16:11 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 125.0% |
| 2026-02-07 | Kennesaw St. | W 77–58 | 10:15 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-05 | Western Ky. | W 71–66 | 21:52 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4-6 | 0-1 | 2-3 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-31 | Missouri St. | L 67–74 | 13:10 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-28 | FIU | W 78–74 | 19:04 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-23 | Middle Tenn. | W 75–58 | 25:48 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-17 | Louisiana Tech | W 64–60 | 26:00 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-14 | Sam Houston | L 62–77 | 21:14 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4-11 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 36.4% |
| 2026-01-10 | Kennesaw St. | L 82–88 | 27:10 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 66.7% |
| 2026-01-07 | FIU | W 71–64 | 19:49 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 8-9 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-04 | Liberty | L 69–78 | 29:28 | 24 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8-11 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 77.3% |
| 2026-01-02 | Delaware | W 67–64 | 17:10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 100.0% |
| 2025-12-29 | Western Ky. | W 78–67 | 26:13 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 4-6 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-20 | ETSU | W 81–75 | 29:48 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 7-9 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Eastern Ky. | L 59–62 | 22:18 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 40.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Georgia St. | L 73–77 | 18:21 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 33.3% |
| 2025-12-01 | North Ala. | L 66–73 | 11:20 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | North Dakota St. | L 43–56 | 15:05 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 33.3% |
| 2025-11-24 | Arkansas St. | L 63–74 | 18:51 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3-6 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 58.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | South Alabama | L 65–71 | 19:31 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 57.1% |
| 2025-11-14 | Coastal Carolina | W 74–67 | 29:18 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 1-5 | 78.6% |