J.R. Konieczny
FGCU · 2025–26 · 26 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
873:05 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 26
- Minutes per game
- 33:35
- Points per game
- 16.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 7.2 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 16.5 | 7.2 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Per 40 minutes | 19.6 | 8.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 428 | 186 | 57 | 46 | 11 | 53 | 57 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 158–352 | 44.9% | 13.5 | 16.1 |
| 2P | 118–230 | 51.3% | 8.8 | 10.5 |
| 3P | 40–122 | 32.8% | 4.7 | 5.6 |
| FT | 72–100 | 72.0% | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.6% | 54.0% | 34.7% | 28.4% | 1.08 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
FGCU · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $35K
- 80% range $11K to $110K
- Median share of team pool
- 15.7%
- team pool $225K, 80% range $82K to $605K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $34K to $39K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $2K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 74.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
FGCU: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | FGCU | $35Kspeculative | $11K to $110K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.1 | -0.1 to +2.3 | Sufficient evidence | +0.6 | +0.5 | +5.5range +4.8 to +6.2 | 2,081 | Season detail | |
| 2025 | Notre Dame | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +0.7 | -0.4 to +1.9 | Sufficient evidence | +0.8 | -0.1 | +2.2range +1.8 to +2.6 | 1,400 | Season detail | |
| 2024 | Notre Dame | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | +1.5 | -0.2 to +3.1 | Sufficient evidence | -0.3 | +1.8 | +2.8range +2.1 to +3.4 | 1,797 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 36:00 | 33:35 | 24:31–38:36 | |
| Points | 19.2 | 16.5 | 4.0–31.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 48.4% | 48.1% | 11.1%–73.5% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-07 | Central Ark. | L 63–73 | 31:45 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2-8 | 1-7 | 2-2 | 31.3% |
| 2026-03-06 · NCAA | Lipscomb | W 77–53 | 34:00 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-12 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 41.7% |
| 2026-03-04 | North Ala. | W 69–58 | 37:19 | 29 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 13-23 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 63.0% |
| 2026-02-28 · NCAA | Stetson | L 63–78 | 38:24 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-16 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 43.8% |
| 2026-02-26 | North Florida | L 70–76 | 38:32 | 31 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11-20 | 3-6 | 6-8 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Central Ark. | W 75–71 | 38:10 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-9 | 0-6 | 2-4 | 11.1% |
| 2026-02-18 | Jacksonville | W 86–84 | 32:36 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 5-6 | 25.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Stetson | W 78–76 | 34:10 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6-14 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 · NCAA | North Florida | W 90–81 | 31:06 | 19 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8-18 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 47.2% |
| 2026-02-07 | Bellarmine | L 65–81 | 31:49 | 20 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9-16 | 0-4 | 2-5 | 56.3% |
| 2026-02-05 | Eastern Ky. | L 74–76 | 29:38 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5-12 | 2-5 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Jacksonville | W 68–49 | 24:31 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4-12 | 0-3 | 1-4 | 33.3% |
| 2026-01-10 · NCAA | Lipscomb | L 77–84 | 37:30 | 26 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12-17 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 73.5% |
| 2026-01-08 · NCAA | Austin Peay | L 71–82 | 37:24 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7-14 | 2-7 | 4-6 | 57.1% |
| 2026-01-03 · NCAA | North Ala. | W 72–55 | 33:48 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 1-4 | 3-4 | 35.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | Central Ark. | L 83–85 | 33:51 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8-16 | 3-10 | 6-6 | 59.4% |
| 2025-12-20 · NCAA | UCF | L 80–102 | 31:54 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6-11 | 4-7 | 1-2 | 72.7% |
| 2025-12-14 | New Mexico | L 59–75 | 28:40 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2-10 | 1-5 | 0-1 | 25.0% |
| 2025-12-07 | Fla. Atlantic | L 76–81 | 34:54 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7-12 | 0-3 | 3-4 | 58.3% |
| 2025-12-03 | FIU | L 83–89 | 34:01 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-26 | Kennesaw St. | L 100–102 | 38:36 | 28 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8-15 | 3-5 | 9-11 | 63.3% |
| 2025-11-25 | Rice | W 78–63 | 35:17 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-12 | 1-3 | 8-11 | 45.8% |
| 2025-11-24 | Oral Roberts | W 93–88 | 28:49 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3-7 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 42.9% |
| 2025-11-19 | Samford | W 77–62 | 33:41 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 43.8% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Chattanooga | W 91–73 | 27:30 | 24 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 9-15 | 2-4 | 4-4 | 66.7% |
| 2025-11-11 | Ga. Southern | L 94–95 | 35:10 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 9-23 | 3-6 | 3-5 | 45.7% |