Sam Donald
Bellarmine · 2025–26 · 29 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
778:55 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 29
- Minutes per game
- 26:52
- Points per game
- 6.5
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 3.3 / 2.1
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 6.5 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.9 |
| Per 40 minutes | 9.7 | 4.9 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.9 |
| Season totals | 189 | 96 | 60 | 22 | 8 | 23 | 56 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 66–128 | 51.6% | 4.4 | 6.6 |
| 2P | 35–54 | 64.8%† | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| 3P | 31–74 | 41.9% | 2.6 | 3.8 |
| FT | 26–34 | 76.5% | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63.7% | 66.1% | 57.8% | 26.6% | 2.61 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Bellarmine · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $41K
- 80% range $11K to $150K
- Median share of team pool
- 17.0%
- team pool $215K, 80% range $75K to $595K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $39K to $47K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 63.8%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Bellarmine: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Bellarmine | $41Kspeculative | $11K to $150K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | +1.1 | -0.3 to +2.5 | Sufficient evidence | +1.2 | -0.1 | +4.3range +3.7 to +4.8 | 1,966 | Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 28:47 | 26:52 | 15:39–39:36 | |
| Points | 7.8 | 6.5 | 2.0–22.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 68.3% | 62.2% | 0.0%–133.3% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Central Ark. | L 73–86 | 31:40 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 1-1 | 66.7% |
| 2026-03-04 | Jacksonville | W 82–79 | 24:26 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 3-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Austin Peay | W 111–97 | 29:42 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4-4 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 112.5% |
| 2026-02-25 | North Ala. | L 68–73 | 29:04 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-21 | Eastern Ky. | L 92–95 | 29:01 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-18 | Lipscomb | L 72–75 | 29:37 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Austin Peay | L 70–90 | 33:57 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-02-11 | Central Ark. | L 76–84 | 28:08 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-07 | FGCU | W 81–65 | 29:26 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6-7 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 107.1% |
| 2026-02-05 | Stetson | W 92–71 | 22:31 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 100.0% |
| 2026-01-31 | Queens (NC) | W 78–75 | 29:09 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | West Ga. | W 77–74 | 26:51 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-24 | North Florida | L 114–117 | 32:35 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8-10 | 5-6 | 1-1 | 105.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Jacksonville | W 77–70 | 25:23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2026-01-17 | Eastern Ky. | L 69–89 | 21:30 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 133.3% |
| 2026-01-15 | Lipscomb | L 71–81 | 15:57 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-2 | 2-2 | 60.0% |
| 2026-01-10 | North Ala. | L 73–82 | 31:40 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Central Ark. | W 84–78 | 39:36 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 40.0% |
| 2026-01-03 | Queens (NC) | L 76–98 | 15:39 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 25.0% |
| 2026-01-01 | West Ga. | L 85–87 | 24:43 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 3-4 | 125.0% |
| 2025-12-23 | Kentucky | L 85–99 | 16:46 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-12-17 | Chattanooga | W 79–64 | 21:00 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 62.5% |
| 2025-12-13 | Northern Ky. | L 76–80 | 26:20 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 64.3% |
| 2025-12-06 | Murray St. | L 68–81 | 21:57 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2025-11-25 | Houston Christian | W 74–69 | 32:42 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-11-24 | The Citadel | W 70–58 | 30:32 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 40.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | Notre Dame | L 79–86 | 25:09 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-6 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Wofford | L 86–94 | 28:54 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-03 | Georgia | L 59–104 | 25:00 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 75.0% |