Brian Waddell
Bellarmine · 2025–26 · 30 available game logs · Speculative compensation · Model-implied values by season · Linked seasons and observed career performance
Logged performance
956:48 minutes logged
- Games logged
- 30
- Minutes per game
- 31:54
- Points per game
- 15.0
- Rebounds / assists per game
- 4.3 / 2.2
| Basis | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per game | 15.0 | 4.3 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| Per 40 minutes | 18.9 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| Season totals | 451 | 130 | 65 | 20 | 14 | 49 | 63 |
| Shot | Made–att. | Pct | Att/G | Att/40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | 174–281 | 61.9% | 9.4 | 11.7 |
| 2P | 149–220 | 67.7% | 7.3 | 9.2 |
| 3P | 25–61 | 41.0% | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| FT | 78–98 | 79.6% | 3.3 | 4.1 |
| eFG% | Estimated TS% | 3PA / FGA | FTA / FGA | AST / TO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 66.4% | 69.6% | 21.7% | 34.9% | 1.33 |
Accepted logged appearances only; absent games are not zeroes. † marks a rate on fewer attempts than the floor (field goal 100, three-point 50, free throw 25). Floors are descriptive, not model output. Definitions
Speculative compensation · 2025–26β
Bellarmine · Low and other · 2025–26 · a best guess at this player's part of the school's own revenue-sharing budget for men's basketball.
- Speculative best guess
- $15K
- 80% range $1K to $63K
- Median share of team pool
- 10.8%
- team pool $215K, 80% range $75K to $595K
- Across scenarios Z1 to Z4
- $15K to $18K
- the elasticity disagreement is carried, not resolved
- Floor part
- $1K
- shared by every player with possessions
- Possession share
- 78.4%
- Sufficient evidence
- Range driven by assumption, not data
Speculative best guess, not observed pay. It is not a contract, not an offer and not a market price, and it is unvalidated: no pay is held to check it against. Point is the median and the range is the 10th to 90th percentile of 4,000 joint draws of budget and player value; a mixture of assumptions, not a calibrated interval.
Budget anchor. Tier prior from anonymous surveys and sources, scaled so that all non-Power budgets sum to the national total the College Sports Commission reported paid for 2025-26 ($1,770,453,776 over 307 schools) less the Power 4 total, times a men's basketball share; weak anchor.
Assumptions. modelled pool; split by possession share times value over replacement; convexity; shared floor; replacement level; four elasticity scenarios; closure to the national total; opt-out list; exclusions. Each is a declared judgement, not an estimate. Numbers, anchors and checks
Not included. Third-party and collective NIL deals, including deals cleared through NIL Go. Non-cash benefits such as scholarship, cost of attendance, Alston awards and housing. Bonuses and incentive terms. Anything outside the school's own revenue-sharing channel.
Bellarmine: whole-roster table and pool · School finances (school-reported) · What-if calculator for this player
No revenue-sharing budget existed before the 2025–26 season, so no compensation figure is modelled for earlier seasons.
What-If Calculator · Speculativeβ
Re-runs the 4,000 joint draws with your inputs. The address saves your inputs.
Model-implied value and speculative compensation by seasonβ
| Season | Team | Speculative compensation (best guess) | Compensation 80% range | Split role | Net | Range | Evidence | Range graphic. Position on one axis | Offense | Defense | Wins above replacement | On-court possessions | Sample and flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Bellarmine | $15Kspeculative | $1K to $63K | descriptive: not used in fit or gates | -0.8 | -1.8 to +0.1 | Sufficient evidence | +2.3 | -3.2 | +4.3range +3.7 to +4.8 | 2,413 | Season detail | |
| 2023 | Purdue | None: no budget that season | — | evaluation: examined, post hoc | -2.7 | -3.4 to -2.0 | Limited evidence | -1.8 | -0.9 | +0.2range +0.2 to +0.3 | 424 | Limited evidence: 300 to 599 on-court possessions. Season detail |
Open circle: limited evidence. Filled circle: sufficient evidence. Vertical line: zero. This table makes no claim about change over time, so it has no change column or trend. Seasons 2011 to 2017 have a point value but no range, so none is shown. Compensation exists for 2025–26 only; earlier rows say that no budget existed. NIL methodology · Compensation methodology
Game log
| Measure | Graphic | Last five | Listed games | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minutes | 33:32 | 31:54 | 22:37–38:05 | |
| Points | 17.0 | 15.0 | 6.0–26.0 | |
| Game eFG% | 74.9% | 66.3% | 30.0%–90.9% |
| Date | Opponent | Result | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | Stl | Blk | TO | PF | FG | 3P | FT | eFG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | Central Ark. | L 73–86 | 33:35 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-3 | 4-4 | 68.8% |
| 2026-03-04 | Jacksonville | W 82–79 | 35:00 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5-8 | 2-2 | 3-4 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-28 | Austin Peay | W 111–97 | 33:14 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 8-11 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 77.3% |
| 2026-02-25 | North Ala. | L 68–73 | 30:31 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5-8 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 62.5% |
| 2026-02-21 | Eastern Ky. | L 92–95 | 35:19 | 23 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 10-11 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 90.9% |
| 2026-02-18 | Lipscomb | L 72–75 | 31:00 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8-12 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 75.0% |
| 2026-02-14 | Austin Peay | L 70–90 | 22:37 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 37.5% |
| 2026-02-11 | Central Ark. | L 76–84 | 31:17 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4-6 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 83.3% |
| 2026-02-07 | FGCU | W 81–65 | 29:00 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 87.5% |
| 2026-02-05 | Stetson | W 92–71 | 25:53 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 87.5% |
| 2026-01-31 | Queens (NC) | W 78–75 | 33:00 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3-10 | 0-2 | 2-3 | 30.0% |
| 2026-01-28 | West Ga. | W 77–74 | 31:27 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 56.3% |
| 2026-01-24 | North Florida | L 114–117 | 37:22 | 26 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12-20 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 65.0% |
| 2026-01-22 | Jacksonville | W 77–70 | 30:18 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5-9 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 55.6% |
| 2026-01-17 | Eastern Ky. | L 69–89 | 32:40 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 9-11 | 42.9% |
| 2026-01-15 | Lipscomb | L 71–81 | 25:45 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 68.8% |
| 2026-01-10 | North Ala. | L 73–82 | 30:41 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8-10 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 90.0% |
| 2026-01-08 | Central Ark. | W 84–78 | 38:05 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-2 | 3-3 | 54.5% |
| 2026-01-03 | Queens (NC) | L 76–98 | 32:41 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7-11 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 68.2% |
| 2026-01-01 | West Ga. | L 85–87 | 31:00 | 19 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7-9 | 0-1 | 5-5 | 77.8% |
| 2025-12-23 | Kentucky | L 85–99 | 30:35 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5-10 | 0-1 | 6-6 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-17 | Chattanooga | W 79–64 | 32:02 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-1 | 3-4 | 60.0% |
| 2025-12-13 | Northern Ky. | L 76–80 | 37:17 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 50.0% |
| 2025-12-06 | Murray St. | L 68–81 | 36:09 | 25 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 8-11 | 2-4 | 7-9 | 81.8% |
| 2025-11-25 | Houston Christian | W 74–69 | 34:06 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 5-6 | 68.8% |
| 2025-11-24 | The Citadel | W 70–58 | 28:48 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6-8 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 81.3% |
| 2025-11-19 | Notre Dame | L 79–86 | 33:39 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6-10 | 1-3 | 5-7 | 65.0% |
| 2025-11-15 · NCAA | Wofford | L 86–94 | 36:00 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9-13 | 1-1 | 4-4 | 73.1% |
| 2025-11-08 | Kansas St. | L 71–98 | 34:15 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4-9 | 2-2 | 1-2 | 55.6% |
| 2025-11-03 | Georgia | L 59–104 | 23:32 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 50.0% |